Progressing Discourse From “How Much a Human’s Life is Cultural?” to “Which Life Domains Are Cultural?”

In psychological science, researchers have long explored how individuals interact with their cultural context. Although it is commonly accepted that cultural factors shape individuals, the extent of this influence has not been clearly established. Some argue that culture profoundly shapes the human psyche, while others suggest a more limited cultural influence. This paper synthesizes these perspectives and reframes the inquiry from ‘To what extent is an individual’s life cultural?’ to “Which life domains are cultural?” To address this empirically, we sourced data from 147,260 participants residing in 88 different countries, who reported on 243 variables across, representing a wide range of different life domains. We analyzed 1,328 parameters derived from Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Within-and-Between Analysis I, which quantify the proportion of variance in phenomena explained by differences at four levels of grouping: country, cultural zones, regions, and residential areas. We found that domains such as religious values, sexuality, social capital, and beliefs about out-groups vary significantly across cultures, whereas economic values, children’s qualities, perceptions of science and technology, and organizational affiliation show less variation. We situate these findings within models explaining societal constructs based on chronology, complexity, and evolutionary obligations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221251387688
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progressing Discourse From “How Much a Human’s Life is Cultural?” to “Which Life Domains Are Cultural?”

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Progressing Discourse From “How Much a Human’s Life is Cultural?” to “Which Life Domains Are Cultural?”

article en

Abstract

In psychological science, researchers have long explored how individuals interact with their cultural context. Although it is commonly accepted that cultural factors shape individuals, the extent of this influence has not been clearly established. Some argue that culture profoundly shapes the human psyche, while others suggest a more limited cultural influence. This paper synthesizes these perspectives and reframes the inquiry from ‘To what extent is an individual’s life cultural?’ to “Which life domains are cultural?” To address this empirically, we sourced data from 147,260 participants residing in 88 different countries, who reported on 243 variables across, representing a wide range of different life domains. We analyzed 1,328 parameters derived from Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Within-and-Between Analysis I, which quantify the proportion of variance in phenomena explained by differences at four levels of grouping: country, cultural zones, regions, and residential areas. We found that domains such as religious values, sexuality, social capital, and beliefs about out-groups vary significantly across cultures, whereas economic values, children’s qualities, perceptions of science and technology, and organizational affiliation show less variation. We situate these findings within models explaining societal constructs based on chronology, complexity, and evolutionary obligations.

Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyVol. 57(3)
University of Georgia (US), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.