CONCEPTULISING SECT AND SECTARIANISM: A HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION

Conceptualising sect and sectarianism has still been a matter of debate. It is generally held that these concepts relate to the sociology of religion; however, their etymological evolution and interdisciplinary applications have led to substantial ambiguity in both scholarly and public understanding. Different etymological versions are specified regarding their historical origins and meanings, but no disgusting meaning has been reported. Initially, the use of terms was unbiased; however, the modern concept is markedly different from the historical one, which is based on a politicised, narrow viewpoint. The paper aims to explore the evolution of these connotations while highlighting the disjunction between their etymological history and modern concepts. The study applies a qualitative methodology by employing a multi-theoretical and interdisciplinary approach to discuss its dynamics, mechanisms and implications. A key finding of this study reveals that sectarianism has become a multi-dimensional and multi-faceted phenomenon today, encompassing historical, cultural, ethnic, political, and economic perspectives; therefore, it cannot be appraised exclusively in terms of a socio-religious phenomenon. However, its economic perspective has not gained the pertinent attention of scholars to delineate its role and implications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JISR management and social sciences & economics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2025.23.1.5
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONCEPTULISING SECT AND SECTARIANISM: A HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION

JISR management and social sciences & economics
Religion and Society Interactions
article

CONCEPTULISING SECT AND SECTARIANISM: A HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION

article en

Abstract

Conceptualising sect and sectarianism has still been a matter of debate. It is generally held that these concepts relate to the sociology of religion; however, their etymological evolution and interdisciplinary applications have led to substantial ambiguity in both scholarly and public understanding. Different etymological versions are specified regarding their historical origins and meanings, but no disgusting meaning has been reported. Initially, the use of terms was unbiased; however, the modern concept is markedly different from the historical one, which is based on a politicised, narrow viewpoint. The paper aims to explore the evolution of these connotations while highlighting the disjunction between their etymological history and modern concepts. The study applies a qualitative methodology by employing a multi-theoretical and interdisciplinary approach to discuss its dynamics, mechanisms and implications. A key finding of this study reveals that sectarianism has become a multi-dimensional and multi-faceted phenomenon today, encompassing historical, cultural, ethnic, political, and economic perspectives; therefore, it cannot be appraised exclusively in terms of a socio-religious phenomenon. However, its economic perspective has not gained the pertinent attention of scholars to delineate its role and implications.

JISR management and social sciences & economicsVol. 23(1)
Federal Urdu University (PK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CONCEPTULISING SECT AND SECTARIANISM: A HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION · JISR management and social sciences & economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS