Geospatial Site Amplification Model for California

ABSTRACT In ground-motion models (GMMs), site terms are typically derived from site-specific velocity profiles, such as VS30 (the time-averaged shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 m) and Z1.0 (the depth to the 1.0 km/s shear-wave velocity horizon). However, these variables are not universally spatially available. This study presents a proof-of-concept model for linear site effects in GMMs for California, developed using broadly accessible geospatial datasets with spatial coverage across the entire study area. The model incorporates data from 95,898 recordings at 2,339 stations, as provided by the DesignSafe Ground-Motion Database (Ji et al., 2022). Mapped geospatial variables, such as sediment thickness, elevation, and surficial geologic units, are compiled for each station. The target site amplification of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudospectral accelerations (PSA) from 0.01 to 10 s is decomposed from the residuals of the Boore et al. (2014) (BSSA14) GMM. A mixed-effects linear regression model is developed using the compiled geospatial variables and validated through fivefold cross-validation. A novel mapped categorical variable, the regional geological unit—defined as a combination of geomorphic provinces and geological units—is introduced due to its strong correlation with site amplification. The geospatial-based site term shows a substantial reduction in site-to-site variability for site amplifications across all frequencies compared to the conventional velocity profile-based site terms; on average, a 10.6% reduction in site-to-site variability is achieved compared to BSSA14 (with a 9.5% reduction at a PSA of 1 s). The model is an improved ergodic model, constructed using geospatial parameters that are mapped across California. This study illustrates the effectiveness of geospatial data as site proxies in developing site terms for GMMs and highlights the potential of geospatial variables for predicting site effects, especially in areas with sparse ground-motion records or limited site-specific velocity measurements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250074
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geospatial Site Amplification Model for California

1 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
article

Geospatial Site Amplification Model for California

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In ground-motion models (GMMs), site terms are typically derived from site-specific velocity profiles, such as VS30 (the time-averaged shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 m) and Z1.0 (the depth to the 1.0 km/s shear-wave velocity horizon). However, these variables are not universally spatially available. This study presents a proof-of-concept model for linear site effects in GMMs for California, developed using broadly accessible geospatial datasets with spatial coverage across the entire study area. The model incorporates data from 95,898 recordings at 2,339 stations, as provided by the DesignSafe Ground-Motion Database (Ji et al., 2022). Mapped geospatial variables, such as sediment thickness, elevation, and surficial geologic units, are compiled for each station. The target site amplification of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudospectral accelerations (PSA) from 0.01 to 10 s is decomposed from the residuals of the Boore et al. (2014) (BSSA14) GMM. A mixed-effects linear regression model is developed using the compiled geospatial variables and validated through fivefold cross-validation. A novel mapped categorical variable, the regional geological unit—defined as a combination of geomorphic provinces and geological units—is introduced due to its strong correlation with site amplification. The geospatial-based site term shows a substantial reduction in site-to-site variability for site amplifications across all frequencies compared to the conventional velocity profile-based site terms; on average, a 10.6% reduction in site-to-site variability is achieved compared to BSSA14 (with a 9.5% reduction at a PSA of 1 s). The model is an improved ergodic model, constructed using geospatial parameters that are mapped across California. This study illustrates the effectiveness of geospatial data as site proxies in developing site terms for GMMs and highlights the potential of geospatial variables for predicting site effects, especially in areas with sparse ground-motion records or limited site-specific velocity measurements.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
University of Central Florida (US), Tufts University (US), Merrimack College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.