Machine Learning-Based Full-Cycle Evaluation Method for Gas Extraction Performance in Coal Mines

With the continuous increase in coal mining depth, gas-related disasters have become a critical constraint for the safe and efficient extraction of coal resources. To address prominent issues such as the lack of scientific evaluation in extraction design, insufficient dynamic monitoring during the process, and delayed effectiveness assessment, this study establishes a full-cycle evaluation framework for gas extraction, encompassing the entire process from design and construction to implementation. A Bayesian optimization-based Random Forest Regression model (BO-RFR) is proposed for the preliminary evaluation of extraction schemes, while a reduced-order prediction model integrating deep neural networks and convolutional autoencoders (DNN-CAE) is developed to enable dynamic prediction and reconstruction of residual gas pressure fields. Field tests demonstrated that the BO-RFR model achieved a residual gas pressure prediction error of less than 0.02 MPa, while the DNN-CAE dynamic evaluation model yielded an average mean squared error (MSE) of 2.73 × 10<sup>-5</sup> and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.00493, confirming the high accuracy and reliability of the proposed method in engineering applications. The results of this study can provide scientific decision-making support for coal mine gas control, enabling precise control and intelligent management of the extraction process. This holds significant practical value for enhancing the safety of coal mine production.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c08507
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Full-Cycle Evaluation Method for Gas Extraction Performance in Coal Mines

1 citations
ACS Omega
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
article

Machine Learning-Based Full-Cycle Evaluation Method for Gas Extraction Performance in Coal Mines

article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the continuous increase in coal mining depth, gas-related disasters have become a critical constraint for the safe and efficient extraction of coal resources. To address prominent issues such as the lack of scientific evaluation in extraction design, insufficient dynamic monitoring during the process, and delayed effectiveness assessment, this study establishes a full-cycle evaluation framework for gas extraction, encompassing the entire process from design and construction to implementation. A Bayesian optimization-based Random Forest Regression model (BO-RFR) is proposed for the preliminary evaluation of extraction schemes, while a reduced-order prediction model integrating deep neural networks and convolutional autoencoders (DNN-CAE) is developed to enable dynamic prediction and reconstruction of residual gas pressure fields. Field tests demonstrated that the BO-RFR model achieved a residual gas pressure prediction error of less than 0.02 MPa, while the DNN-CAE dynamic evaluation model yielded an average mean squared error (MSE) of 2.73 × 10<sup>-5</sup> and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.00493, confirming the high accuracy and reliability of the proposed method in engineering applications. The results of this study can provide scientific decision-making support for coal mine gas control, enabling precise control and intelligent management of the extraction process. This holds significant practical value for enhancing the safety of coal mine production.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(49)
Henan Energy & Chemical Industry Group (China) (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.