31-Gene expression profiling for cutaneous melanoma: An expert consensus panel

Purpose To review published literature on the clinical efficacy, use, and accuracy of the 31-gene expression profiling (31-GEP) test for prognostic information in invasive melanoma. Methods A comprehensive literature search used keywords "31-gene expression profiling," "melanoma," "prognosis," "clinical efficacy," and "clinical utility." A panel of 10 dermatologists with expertise in melanoma management reviewed the articles and created consensus statements. A modified Delphi process approved each statement, requiring supermajority approval through multiple rounds of real-time voting, with strength of recommendation assigned. Results The search produced 150 articles; 26 met inclusion criteria. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 9 consensus statements and recommendations regarding 31-GEP testing: 8 with strength "A" and 1 with strength "C." Conclusion The panel agreed there is strong support for using 31-GEP testing to provide prognostic information for invasive melanoma. The test provides prognostic information when thickness and other traditional factors are unknown, improves prognosis assessment when added to American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system, and is associated with improved melanoma-specific mortality and overall survival. The panel concluded that the robust existing literature strongly supports its use as a best practice for appropriate patients with melanoma.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatology Online Journal
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25251/c81v6j23
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

31-Gene expression profiling for cutaneous melanoma: An expert consensus panel

Dermatology Online Journal
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

31-Gene expression profiling for cutaneous melanoma: An expert consensus panel

article en

Abstract

Purpose To review published literature on the clinical efficacy, use, and accuracy of the 31-gene expression profiling (31-GEP) test for prognostic information in invasive melanoma. Methods A comprehensive literature search used keywords "31-gene expression profiling," "melanoma," "prognosis," "clinical efficacy," and "clinical utility." A panel of 10 dermatologists with expertise in melanoma management reviewed the articles and created consensus statements. A modified Delphi process approved each statement, requiring supermajority approval through multiple rounds of real-time voting, with strength of recommendation assigned. Results The search produced 150 articles; 26 met inclusion criteria. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 9 consensus statements and recommendations regarding 31-GEP testing: 8 with strength "A" and 1 with strength "C." Conclusion The panel agreed there is strong support for using 31-GEP testing to provide prognostic information for invasive melanoma. The test provides prognostic information when thickness and other traditional factors are unknown, improves prognosis assessment when added to American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system, and is associated with improved melanoma-specific mortality and overall survival. The panel concluded that the robust existing literature strongly supports its use as a best practice for appropriate patients with melanoma.

Dermatology Online JournalVol. 31(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of North Texas (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), University of Utah (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), Las Vegas Institute (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), New York University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Celgene, Arthrex, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Celltrion, Ortho Dermatologics, Castle Biosciences, Meiji Seika Pharma, Galderma, Sun Pharma, LEO Pharma, Genentech
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.