History Education and Generative AI: Navigating Accuracy and Bias

In the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the potential for AI-powered tools to revolutionize history education is immense, offering students worldwide quick and precise resources to investigate the depths of history. However, the critical factor lies in ensuring the accuracy of these tools to benefit learners truly. To address this concern, a qualitative research study was conducted to explore the research gap surrounding AI-generated responses related to two historical conflicts with conflicting historical narratives: Palestine-Israel and Ukraine-Russia. The aim was to scrutinize the accuracy and potential biases present in AI-generated content. The findings from the study revealed that ChatGPT, an AI language model, exhibited bias that reflected the political stance of the United States when responding to prompts related to historical conflicts. While the use of ChatGPT for historical learning purposes has shown promise in enhancing access to historical information, the study highlighted the model's inherent bias, indicating its unreliability when compared to primary historical sources. As a result, there is a clear need for future research endeavors to focus on developing inclusive and impartial AI-powered learning models to ensure accurate and unbiased historical education.

Publication Details

Journal
PRSM
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34874/prsm/languelitterature-n3.4213
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

History Education and Generative AI: Navigating Accuracy and Bias

PRSM
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

History Education and Generative AI: Navigating Accuracy and Bias

article en

Abstract

In the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the potential for AI-powered tools to revolutionize history education is immense, offering students worldwide quick and precise resources to investigate the depths of history. However, the critical factor lies in ensuring the accuracy of these tools to benefit learners truly. To address this concern, a qualitative research study was conducted to explore the research gap surrounding AI-generated responses related to two historical conflicts with conflicting historical narratives: Palestine-Israel and Ukraine-Russia. The aim was to scrutinize the accuracy and potential biases present in AI-generated content. The findings from the study revealed that ChatGPT, an AI language model, exhibited bias that reflected the political stance of the United States when responding to prompts related to historical conflicts. While the use of ChatGPT for historical learning purposes has shown promise in enhancing access to historical information, the study highlighted the model's inherent bias, indicating its unreliability when compared to primary historical sources. As a result, there is a clear need for future research endeavors to focus on developing inclusive and impartial AI-powered learning models to ensure accurate and unbiased historical education.

PRSM
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.