Dataset Assessment Tools for the AI Act Compliance of High-Risk AI Systems

The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), effective as of August 2024, introduces stringent data governance requirements for high-risk AI systems. Central to these obligations is the mandate for data used in training, validation, and testing to be subject to rigorous quality controls and governance practices aligned with the system's intended purpose. This paper examines the AI Act’s novel emphasis on responsible data handling as a foundation for mitigating bias, ensuring safety, and protecting fundamental rights. It argues that while existing scholarship largely focuses on algorithmic fairness at the model level, insufficient attention has been given to fairness embedded within the data itself. Addressing this gap, the paper explores the complex ethical and epistemological tensions inherent in defining “fairness”, and critiques current policy frameworks for their narrow focus on technical fixes. The study highlights the FAnFAIR tool as a pioneering approach to data fairness evaluation, offering a hybrid methodology that integrates automated statistical diagnostics with qualitative, context-aware assessments. FAnFAIR aligns its features with the AI Act’s legal mandates and facilitates compliance through continuous bias monitoring, data quality enhancement, and informed decision-making about dataset suitability. This paper provides a socio-legal and technical analysis of data governance under the AI Act, advocating for a shift toward embedded ethical oversight throughout the AI lifecycle and, in particular, in the data processing phase.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Torino
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2785-7867/12840
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dataset Assessment Tools for the AI Act Compliance of High-Risk AI Systems

Università degli Studi di Torino
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Dataset Assessment Tools for the AI Act Compliance of High-Risk AI Systems

article en

Abstract

The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), effective as of August 2024, introduces stringent data governance requirements for high-risk AI systems. Central to these obligations is the mandate for data used in training, validation, and testing to be subject to rigorous quality controls and governance practices aligned with the system's intended purpose. This paper examines the AI Act’s novel emphasis on responsible data handling as a foundation for mitigating bias, ensuring safety, and protecting fundamental rights. It argues that while existing scholarship largely focuses on algorithmic fairness at the model level, insufficient attention has been given to fairness embedded within the data itself. Addressing this gap, the paper explores the complex ethical and epistemological tensions inherent in defining “fairness”, and critiques current policy frameworks for their narrow focus on technical fixes. The study highlights the FAnFAIR tool as a pioneering approach to data fairness evaluation, offering a hybrid methodology that integrates automated statistical diagnostics with qualitative, context-aware assessments. FAnFAIR aligns its features with the AI Act’s legal mandates and facilitates compliance through continuous bias monitoring, data quality enhancement, and informed decision-making about dataset suitability. This paper provides a socio-legal and technical analysis of data governance under the AI Act, advocating for a shift toward embedded ethical oversight throughout the AI lifecycle and, in particular, in the data processing phase.

Università degli Studi di Torino
University Carlo Cattaneo (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dataset Assessment Tools for the AI Act Compliance of High-Risk AI Systems · Università degli Studi di Torino (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS