Psychological Pain in Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Populations: Findings from the Translated German Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale

Objective: Assessing psychological pain is crucial for evaluating suicide risk. This study examined differences in psychological pain between patients with suicide attempts, those with suicidal ideation, clinical, and non-clinical controls using a newly translated German version of the Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS). Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with two independent samples collected a different sites (sample 1: n=409; sample 2: n=171), resulting in a total sample of N=580 (59% female; age: M=34.6, SD=13.2). All analyses were conducted on the combined full sample. Participants were divided into four groups: patients with a suicide attempt (SUAT), patients with suicidal ideation but no lifetime suicide attempt (SUID), clinical control patients without suicidal ideation or attempts (CLIN), and non-clinical control participants (HLTH). MBPPAS scores were compared across groups. Results: SUAT reported significantly higher psychological pain than SUID (p<.001, d=0.42), CLIN (p<.001, d=1.46), and HLTH (p<.001, d=1.04). SUID had significantly higher MBPPAS scores than both CLIN (p<.001, d=3.01) and HLTH (p<.001, d=2.57). Internal consistency of the German MBPPAS was excellent (α = .93, ω = .93), and the scale showed good psychometric properties regarding convergent, incremental, and criterion validity. Conclusions: The findings highlight significant differences in psychological pain across clinical and control groups, supporting the utility of the German MBPPAS in identifying psychological pain in patients at varying levels of suicide risk.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92736
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Pain in Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Populations: Findings from the Translated German Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Psychological Pain in Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Populations: Findings from the Translated German Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale

article en

Abstract

Objective: Assessing psychological pain is crucial for evaluating suicide risk. This study examined differences in psychological pain between patients with suicide attempts, those with suicidal ideation, clinical, and non-clinical controls using a newly translated German version of the Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS). Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with two independent samples collected a different sites (sample 1: n=409; sample 2: n=171), resulting in a total sample of N=580 (59% female; age: M=34.6, SD=13.2). All analyses were conducted on the combined full sample. Participants were divided into four groups: patients with a suicide attempt (SUAT), patients with suicidal ideation but no lifetime suicide attempt (SUID), clinical control patients without suicidal ideation or attempts (CLIN), and non-clinical control participants (HLTH). MBPPAS scores were compared across groups. Results: SUAT reported significantly higher psychological pain than SUID (p<.001, d=0.42), CLIN (p<.001, d=1.46), and HLTH (p<.001, d=1.04). SUID had significantly higher MBPPAS scores than both CLIN (p<.001, d=3.01) and HLTH (p<.001, d=2.57). Internal consistency of the German MBPPAS was excellent (α = .93, ω = .93), and the scale showed good psychometric properties regarding convergent, incremental, and criterion validity. Conclusions: The findings highlight significant differences in psychological pain across clinical and control groups, supporting the utility of the German MBPPAS in identifying psychological pain in patients at varying levels of suicide risk.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.