Weekly Trends in Phosphate Levels During Hemodiafiltration

Background: Phosphate (P) levels control in patients on dialysis remains a challenge. Hemodiafiltration (HDF) appears to improve P levels, though the literature is limited regarding the evaluation of hyperphosphatemia throughout the week. We hypothesized that P levels would improve during a HDF week, with a reduction in prevalence toward the last sessions. Methods: This cross-sectional, multicenter study aimed to evaluate P levels before dialysis, after 1 hour, and at the end of the procedure in patients on maintenance HDF. Data from all consecutive HDF sessions over one week were included. We have compared P levels according to dialysis shift, frequency (3 vs. 4-6 times per week), and duration. Hyperphosphatemia was defined as pre HDF P levels > 5.5 mg/dL. Results: A total of 79 patients (60.8% male, 44% on conventional, 49.4% on short-daily and 6.3% on long nocturnal HDF) were included in the study. P levels measured before HDF, after 1 hour, and at the end of the procedure did not differ significantly across dialysis shifts, frequency, or session duration (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). A significant reduction in P levels was observed, with decreases of up to 2.5 mg/dL after 1 hour and 2.8 mg/dL at the end of the procedure across all sessions throughout the week. Pre-dialysis P levels decreased from the first to the last session of the week in patients undergoing 3, 5, and 6 sessions of HDF/week. Among the first three HDF sessions, 27.6% of patients exhibited persistent hyperphosphatemia. This group had significantly higher P levels (p<0.001), urea (p=0.014), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (p=0.034) before the first HDF session of the week compared to patients without hyperphosphatemia, who represented 51.3% of the cases. Additionally, 14.5% of patients showed improvement in hyperphosphatemia, which occurred mostly in the second session (72.7%). Conclusion: Hyperphosphatemia remains a challenging issue for patients undergoing HDF. The characteristics of the patients, as well as the timing of P level assessments throughout the week, significantly influence the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia. These findings highlight the need for a standardized approach in assessing hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients to facilitate comparisons across populations and studies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20258aqr5v9p
Primary Topic
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weekly Trends in Phosphate Levels During Hemodiafiltration

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Weekly Trends in Phosphate Levels During Hemodiafiltration

article en

Abstract

Background: Phosphate (P) levels control in patients on dialysis remains a challenge. Hemodiafiltration (HDF) appears to improve P levels, though the literature is limited regarding the evaluation of hyperphosphatemia throughout the week. We hypothesized that P levels would improve during a HDF week, with a reduction in prevalence toward the last sessions. Methods: This cross-sectional, multicenter study aimed to evaluate P levels before dialysis, after 1 hour, and at the end of the procedure in patients on maintenance HDF. Data from all consecutive HDF sessions over one week were included. We have compared P levels according to dialysis shift, frequency (3 vs. 4-6 times per week), and duration. Hyperphosphatemia was defined as pre HDF P levels > 5.5 mg/dL. Results: A total of 79 patients (60.8% male, 44% on conventional, 49.4% on short-daily and 6.3% on long nocturnal HDF) were included in the study. P levels measured before HDF, after 1 hour, and at the end of the procedure did not differ significantly across dialysis shifts, frequency, or session duration (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). A significant reduction in P levels was observed, with decreases of up to 2.5 mg/dL after 1 hour and 2.8 mg/dL at the end of the procedure across all sessions throughout the week. Pre-dialysis P levels decreased from the first to the last session of the week in patients undergoing 3, 5, and 6 sessions of HDF/week. Among the first three HDF sessions, 27.6% of patients exhibited persistent hyperphosphatemia. This group had significantly higher P levels (p<0.001), urea (p=0.014), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (p=0.034) before the first HDF session of the week compared to patients without hyperphosphatemia, who represented 51.3% of the cases. Additionally, 14.5% of patients showed improvement in hyperphosphatemia, which occurred mostly in the second session (72.7%). Conclusion: Hyperphosphatemia remains a challenging issue for patients undergoing HDF. The characteristics of the patients, as well as the timing of P level assessments throughout the week, significantly influence the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia. These findings highlight the need for a standardized approach in assessing hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients to facilitate comparisons across populations and studies.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Kidney Care UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.