Thermal resistance of snow cover

The subject of the study is a snow cover consisting of an arbitrary number of layers of varying thickness and different snow densities. The thermal resistance of such a cover has been investigated. One of the key parameters in the study of the interaction of various engineering structures with snow is the thermal resistance of the snow cover. The aim of the work was to assess the accuracy of calculating the thermal resistance of a layered snow cover when averaging the snow density with depth. Two approaches to determining the thermal resistance of the snow cover have been considered: as a layered structure and as an equivalent homogeneous structure with a constant average density calculated as a weighted average. Classical formulas for determining the thermal conductivity coefficient based on the density of the snow cover—namely, the formulas by G.P. Abels and N.I. Osokin—were used for calculations of thermal resistance. A comparison of two calculation methods for computing the thermal resistance of the snow cover was carried out: as the sum of the thermal resistances of the layers and as a single-layer structure with weighted average density. The analysis of numerical and graphical data allowed for the following main conclusions. With a nonlinear relationship between the thermal conductivity coefficient and the snow density, the error increases with the increase in the compaction coefficient of one of the layers. For example, when the density of a layer doubles, the relative calculation error ranges from 20% to 30.0% and depends on the ratio of the thicknesses of the individual layers. It was established that when the compaction of one layer is less than 1.6 times, the use of the concept of "average snow cover density" in thermal calculations for determining the thermal resistance of the snow cover is quite acceptable. In this case, the error will not exceed the allowable value in engineering practice. With increased compaction, it is necessary to calculate the total thermal resistance of the snow cover as the sum of the thermal resistances of individual layers, as is customary in building thermal physics for determining the thermal resistance of enclosing structures. Further research should focus on determining the accuracy of thermal resistance calculations as the snow density depends on the layer thickness, as well as accounting for the influence of snow structure with constant density on the thermal conductivity coefficient. It is also of interest to compare these theoretical calculations with existing data from field observations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Арктика и Антарктика
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2453-8922.2026.1.76960
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal resistance of snow cover

Арктика и Антарктика
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Thermal resistance of snow cover

article en

Abstract

The subject of the study is a snow cover consisting of an arbitrary number of layers of varying thickness and different snow densities. The thermal resistance of such a cover has been investigated. One of the key parameters in the study of the interaction of various engineering structures with snow is the thermal resistance of the snow cover. The aim of the work was to assess the accuracy of calculating the thermal resistance of a layered snow cover when averaging the snow density with depth. Two approaches to determining the thermal resistance of the snow cover have been considered: as a layered structure and as an equivalent homogeneous structure with a constant average density calculated as a weighted average. Classical formulas for determining the thermal conductivity coefficient based on the density of the snow cover—namely, the formulas by G.P. Abels and N.I. Osokin—were used for calculations of thermal resistance. A comparison of two calculation methods for computing the thermal resistance of the snow cover was carried out: as the sum of the thermal resistances of the layers and as a single-layer structure with weighted average density. The analysis of numerical and graphical data allowed for the following main conclusions. With a nonlinear relationship between the thermal conductivity coefficient and the snow density, the error increases with the increase in the compaction coefficient of one of the layers. For example, when the density of a layer doubles, the relative calculation error ranges from 20% to 30.0% and depends on the ratio of the thicknesses of the individual layers. It was established that when the compaction of one layer is less than 1.6 times, the use of the concept of "average snow cover density" in thermal calculations for determining the thermal resistance of the snow cover is quite acceptable. In this case, the error will not exceed the allowable value in engineering practice. With increased compaction, it is necessary to calculate the total thermal resistance of the snow cover as the sum of the thermal resistances of individual layers, as is customary in building thermal physics for determining the thermal resistance of enclosing structures. Further research should focus on determining the accuracy of thermal resistance calculations as the snow density depends on the layer thickness, as well as accounting for the influence of snow structure with constant density on the thermal conductivity coefficient. It is also of interest to compare these theoretical calculations with existing data from field observations.

Арктика и Антарктика(4)
North-Eastern Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.