The behavioral structure of one-shot cooperation in small and large groups

Cooperation is essential for realizing collective benefits in both small and large groups. In modern societies, many interactions are one-shot and differ in the magnitude of collective benefits. This paper identifies the unified behavioral structure underlying one-shot cooperation. Using online public goods games (N=2,136) and two versions of the strategy method, we examine how attitudes toward cooperation—the causal relationship between one’s own cooperation and others’—and beliefs about others’ cooperation explain cooperative behavior across group sizes (3, 9, and 30) and collective returns (low vs. high). Our ABC framework (Attitudes and Beliefs explain Cooperation) reveals a consistent structure: average attitudes toward cooperation are equally conditionally cooperative across all settings, while beliefs increase with the collective benefit of cooperation but not with group size, although beliefs become more important the larger the group. These results suggest that the ABC framework provides a parsimonious behavioral foundation for understanding one-shot cooperation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107828
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The behavioral structure of one-shot cooperation in small and large groups

1 links
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

The behavioral structure of one-shot cooperation in small and large groups

article en

Abstract

Cooperation is essential for realizing collective benefits in both small and large groups. In modern societies, many interactions are one-shot and differ in the magnitude of collective benefits. This paper identifies the unified behavioral structure underlying one-shot cooperation. Using online public goods games (N=2,136) and two versions of the strategy method, we examine how attitudes toward cooperation—the causal relationship between one’s own cooperation and others’—and beliefs about others’ cooperation explain cooperative behavior across group sizes (3, 9, and 30) and collective returns (low vs. high). Our ABC framework (Attitudes and Beliefs explain Cooperation) reveals a consistent structure: average attitudes toward cooperation are equally conditionally cooperative across all settings, while beliefs increase with the collective benefit of cooperation but not with group size, although beliefs become more important the larger the group. These results suggest that the ABC framework provides a parsimonious behavioral foundation for understanding one-shot cooperation.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 252
University of Nottingham (GB), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon