Evaluation of Projection Images for Visual Quality Control of Automated Left and Right Lung Segmentations on T1-Weighted MRI in Large-Scale Clinical Cohort Studies

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To assess diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) projection methods for rapid visual quality control of automated volumetric (3D) lung segmentations compared with slice-based 3D review of segmentation results for application in large-scale studies. <b>Methods</b>: Segmentation of right and left lungs on T1-weighted MRI of 300 participants of the German National Cohort (NAKO) study was performed using the nnU-NET framework. Three variants of 2D projection images of segmentation masks were created: maximum intensity projection (MIP) using pseudo-chromadepth encoding with different color spectra for right and left lung (Colored_MIP) and standard deviation projection of segmentation mask outlines, encoded in black-and-white (Gray_outline) or using color-encoding (Colored_outline). The worst of two ratings by two independent raters conducting slice-based review for segmentation errors on underlying imaging data and review for mislabeling errors served as the standard of reference. All variants were evaluated by five raters each for identification of segmentation errors and the majority rating was used as index test. The time required for review was recorded and diagnostic accuracies were calculated. <b>Results</b>: Sensitivities of Colored_MIP, Colored_outline and Gray_outline were 88.2% [95%-CI 78.7%; 94.4%], 89.5% [80.3%; 95.3%] and 78.9% [68.1%; 87.5%]; specificities were 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%], 96.4% [93.1%; 98.5%] and 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%]; and F1-scores were 0.918, 0.895 and 0.863, respectively. Mean time per case and rater required for evaluation was 2.8 ± 0.9 s for Colored_outline, 1.7 ± 0.1 s for Colored_MIP, and 2.0 ± 0.4 s for Gray_outline. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 2D segmentation mask projection images enabled the detection of segmentation errors of automated 3D segmentations of left and right lungs based on MRI with high diagnostic accuracy, especially when using color-encoding. The method enabled evaluation within a matter of seconds per case. Segmentation mask projection images may assist in visual quality control of automated segmentations in large-scale studies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11120135
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Projection Images for Visual Quality Control of Automated Left and Right Lung Segmentations on T1-Weighted MRI in Large-Scale Clinical Cohort Studies

Tomography
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Evaluation of Projection Images for Visual Quality Control of Automated Left and Right Lung Segmentations on T1-Weighted MRI in Large-Scale Clinical Cohort Studies

article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To assess diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) projection methods for rapid visual quality control of automated volumetric (3D) lung segmentations compared with slice-based 3D review of segmentation results for application in large-scale studies. <b>Methods</b>: Segmentation of right and left lungs on T1-weighted MRI of 300 participants of the German National Cohort (NAKO) study was performed using the nnU-NET framework. Three variants of 2D projection images of segmentation masks were created: maximum intensity projection (MIP) using pseudo-chromadepth encoding with different color spectra for right and left lung (Colored_MIP) and standard deviation projection of segmentation mask outlines, encoded in black-and-white (Gray_outline) or using color-encoding (Colored_outline). The worst of two ratings by two independent raters conducting slice-based review for segmentation errors on underlying imaging data and review for mislabeling errors served as the standard of reference. All variants were evaluated by five raters each for identification of segmentation errors and the majority rating was used as index test. The time required for review was recorded and diagnostic accuracies were calculated. <b>Results</b>: Sensitivities of Colored_MIP, Colored_outline and Gray_outline were 88.2% [95%-CI 78.7%; 94.4%], 89.5% [80.3%; 95.3%] and 78.9% [68.1%; 87.5%]; specificities were 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%], 96.4% [93.1%; 98.5%] and 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%]; and F1-scores were 0.918, 0.895 and 0.863, respectively. Mean time per case and rater required for evaluation was 2.8 ± 0.9 s for Colored_outline, 1.7 ± 0.1 s for Colored_MIP, and 2.0 ± 0.4 s for Gray_outline. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 2D segmentation mask projection images enabled the detection of segmentation errors of automated 3D segmentations of left and right lungs based on MRI with high diagnostic accuracy, especially when using color-encoding. The method enabled evaluation within a matter of seconds per case. Segmentation mask projection images may assist in visual quality control of automated segmentations in large-scale studies.

TomographyVol. 11(12)
University of Freiburg (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.