Over Reliant on Artificial Intelligence and Their Depleting Effects on Natural Inelegant Quotient: A Critical Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in the twenty-first century, reshaping education, healthcare, business, governance, and everyday social interaction. The widespread accessibility of AI-driven systems, particularly generative and conversational models, has created unprecedented opportunities for human augmentation. Yet, alongside these opportunities lies the danger of overdependence – what may be described as “wrong addiction” to AI – characterized by unreflective reliance that substitutes rather than complements natural intelligence. This critical review synthesizes literature across cognitive psychology, philosophy of technology, and educational theory to examine how wrong addiction depletes natural IQ, especially in the domains of memory, critical thinking, creativity, and social intelligence. Unlike earlier technologies, AI introduces a unique risk through its interactive and generative capabilities, which can encourage cognitive substitution rather than extension. The paper identifies significant gaps in empirical research, particularly concerning long-term impacts of AI dependence on creativity and social cognition, and calls for the development of digital literacy frameworks and pedagogical interventions that safeguard human intellectual resilience in an age of intelligent machines.

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i5-1712224
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Over Reliant on Artificial Intelligence and Their Depleting Effects on Natural Inelegant Quotient: A Critical Review

Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Over Reliant on Artificial Intelligence and Their Depleting Effects on Natural Inelegant Quotient: A Critical Review

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in the twenty-first century, reshaping education, healthcare, business, governance, and everyday social interaction. The widespread accessibility of AI-driven systems, particularly generative and conversational models, has created unprecedented opportunities for human augmentation. Yet, alongside these opportunities lies the danger of overdependence – what may be described as “wrong addiction” to AI – characterized by unreflective reliance that substitutes rather than complements natural intelligence. This critical review synthesizes literature across cognitive psychology, philosophy of technology, and educational theory to examine how wrong addiction depletes natural IQ, especially in the domains of memory, critical thinking, creativity, and social intelligence. Unlike earlier technologies, AI introduces a unique risk through its interactive and generative capabilities, which can encourage cognitive substitution rather than extension. The paper identifies significant gaps in empirical research, particularly concerning long-term impacts of AI dependence on creativity and social cognition, and calls for the development of digital literacy frameworks and pedagogical interventions that safeguard human intellectual resilience in an age of intelligent machines.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.