3% vs. 5% Albumin in Plasma Exchange for Kidney Rejection: A Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Resource-Limited Settings?

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a major cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a cornerstone in AMR management, requiring the use of replacement fluids—typically 5% albumin, a costly formulation in many healthcare systems. Due to resource limitations, our center adopted the use of 3% albumin as a lower-cost alternative, despite limited evidence regarding its hemodynamic safety. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, analytical study including 54 TPE sessions in 20 patients with biopsy-confirmed AMR at Hospital Juárez de México. Patients were grouped according to the albumin concentration used (3% vs. 5%). We analyzed hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate), incidence of hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), laboratory values, and direct treatment costs. Results: MAP remained stable across all time points evaluated (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes) in both groups, with no statistically significant differences. Hypotension was infrequent (10.7% in the 3% group vs. 3.6% in the 5% group; p = 0.61), and only one patient in the 3% group exhibited clinical symptoms. Heart rate remained within normal range and showed no relevant variation. Laboratory parameters, including serum albumin, calcium, and hemoglobin, remained within physiological limits, with no significant intergroup differences. Economic analysis revealed a significantly lower median cost in the 3% albumin group (approximately $880 USD) compared to the 5% albumin group (approximately $1,410 USD; p < 0.01), without compromising hemodynamic safety or clinical efficacy Conclusion: These findings support the use of 3% albumin as a safe and cost-effective replacement fluid during TPE for AMR. This approach may contribute to more sustainable resource utilization, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further validate these results and guide future practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025fk4k1cat
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3% vs. 5% Albumin in Plasma Exchange for Kidney Rejection: A Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Resource-Limited Settings?

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

3% vs. 5% Albumin in Plasma Exchange for Kidney Rejection: A Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Resource-Limited Settings?

article en

Abstract

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a major cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a cornerstone in AMR management, requiring the use of replacement fluids—typically 5% albumin, a costly formulation in many healthcare systems. Due to resource limitations, our center adopted the use of 3% albumin as a lower-cost alternative, despite limited evidence regarding its hemodynamic safety. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, analytical study including 54 TPE sessions in 20 patients with biopsy-confirmed AMR at Hospital Juárez de México. Patients were grouped according to the albumin concentration used (3% vs. 5%). We analyzed hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate), incidence of hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), laboratory values, and direct treatment costs. Results: MAP remained stable across all time points evaluated (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes) in both groups, with no statistically significant differences. Hypotension was infrequent (10.7% in the 3% group vs. 3.6% in the 5% group; p = 0.61), and only one patient in the 3% group exhibited clinical symptoms. Heart rate remained within normal range and showed no relevant variation. Laboratory parameters, including serum albumin, calcium, and hemoglobin, remained within physiological limits, with no significant intergroup differences. Economic analysis revealed a significantly lower median cost in the 3% albumin group (approximately $880 USD) compared to the 5% albumin group (approximately $1,410 USD; p < 0.01), without compromising hemodynamic safety or clinical efficacy Conclusion: These findings support the use of 3% albumin as a safe and cost-effective replacement fluid during TPE for AMR. This approach may contribute to more sustainable resource utilization, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further validate these results and guide future practice.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Hospital Juárez de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.