Prameya-Ratnārṇava of Bālakṛṣṇa Bhaṭṭa

The Vedāntic tradition associated with Vallabha (1478–1530) remains relatively understudied in academic circles. According to its reading of scriptural texts such as the Upaniṣads, the Bhagavad-gītā, and the Bhāgavata-purāṇa, there is a pure (śuddha) non-dualism (advaita) between the finite world and the supremely personal divine reality, Lord Kṛṣṇa. The sole divine reality (brahman) is Kṛṣṇa and, as the intrinsically “pure” reality, Kṛṣṇa is devoid of any connection with the illusory principle of māyā. So, according to Vallabha, only non-difference between the human self and Kṛṣṇa is real. This claim is strikingly similar to the fundamental thesis of Śaṃkara’s Advaita Vedānta which too propounds a not-twoness (advaita) between the world and brahman. However, while both Śaṃkara and Vallabha view the world as non-different from brahman, they understand the notion of advaita in two distinct senses. Śaṃkara’s exegeses present brahman as advaita with a world which is metaphysically unreal, while for Vallabha the Lord Kṛṣṇa is advaita with a world which is metaphysically real.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.123534
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prameya-Ratnārṇava of Bālakṛṣṇa Bhaṭṭa

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Prameya-Ratnārṇava of Bālakṛṣṇa Bhaṭṭa

article en

Abstract

The Vedāntic tradition associated with Vallabha (1478–1530) remains relatively understudied in academic circles. According to its reading of scriptural texts such as the Upaniṣads, the Bhagavad-gītā, and the Bhāgavata-purāṇa, there is a pure (śuddha) non-dualism (advaita) between the finite world and the supremely personal divine reality, Lord Kṛṣṇa. The sole divine reality (brahman) is Kṛṣṇa and, as the intrinsically “pure” reality, Kṛṣṇa is devoid of any connection with the illusory principle of māyā. So, according to Vallabha, only non-difference between the human self and Kṛṣṇa is real. This claim is strikingly similar to the fundamental thesis of Śaṃkara’s Advaita Vedānta which too propounds a not-twoness (advaita) between the world and brahman. However, while both Śaṃkara and Vallabha view the world as non-different from brahman, they understand the notion of advaita in two distinct senses. Śaṃkara’s exegeses present brahman as advaita with a world which is metaphysically unreal, while for Vallabha the Lord Kṛṣṇa is advaita with a world which is metaphysically real.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.