Applying the partial order continual reassessment method to high-dimensional treatment combinations

Recent years have seen increasing popularities in therapies that combines several drugs and/or schedules, which imposes great difficulties on the design of appropriate Phase I clinical trials. The Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method (POCRM), among others, is a popular design that can be easily adapted to those complex settings. However, the design is introduced and evaluated in the setting of the combination of two drugs, and the combination of more than two drugs has rarely been investigated. In particular, the specification of toxicity orderings has always been an essential part of the POCRM, which becomes more difficult in high-dimensional settings due to the combinatorially increasing nature of the number of possible orderings of combination/schedules. This paper proposes a systematic approach to specify orderings based on asymptotic properties in the setting of the combination of more than two drugs. Large simulation studies show that this novel ordering specification method leads to better design performance both asymptotically and with finite sample sizes.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.123540
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the partial order continual reassessment method to high-dimensional treatment combinations

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Applying the partial order continual reassessment method to high-dimensional treatment combinations

article en

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing popularities in therapies that combines several drugs and/or schedules, which imposes great difficulties on the design of appropriate Phase I clinical trials. The Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Method (POCRM), among others, is a popular design that can be easily adapted to those complex settings. However, the design is introduced and evaluated in the setting of the combination of two drugs, and the combination of more than two drugs has rarely been investigated. In particular, the specification of toxicity orderings has always been an essential part of the POCRM, which becomes more difficult in high-dimensional settings due to the combinatorially increasing nature of the number of possible orderings of combination/schedules. This paper proposes a systematic approach to specify orderings based on asymptotic properties in the setting of the combination of more than two drugs. Large simulation studies show that this novel ordering specification method leads to better design performance both asymptotically and with finite sample sizes.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Applying the partial order continual reassessment method to high-dimensional treatment combinations · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS