Evaluating Large Language Models for Analysing Safety Risks in Healthcare Incident Reports

Incident reports provide a rich source for analysing safety risks in healthcare systems. To support the timely analysis and interpretation of incident reports, natural language processing (NLP) can be applied. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs) in extracting the causes of incidents and identifying contributing factors from incident reports. As dataset, we considered 10,063 messages from CIRRNET®, the Swiss national database for critical incidents in healthcare. We applied the LLM Gemma-2 to extract events, causes and contributing factors and group them along themes. 100 event reports were assessed manually regarding quality of extraction. Events were extracted with 92% accuracy, causes with 84% and contributing factors with 72% accuracy. Extraction of contributing factors fails as the LLM hallucinates or interprets. We conclude that LLMs show potential in analysing incident reports and can improve the efficiency and consistency of incident analysis.

Publication Details

Journal
BFH: ARBOR
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/12099
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Large Language Models for Analysing Safety Risks in Healthcare Incident Reports

BFH: ARBOR
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Evaluating Large Language Models for Analysing Safety Risks in Healthcare Incident Reports

article en

Abstract

Incident reports provide a rich source for analysing safety risks in healthcare systems. To support the timely analysis and interpretation of incident reports, natural language processing (NLP) can be applied. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs) in extracting the causes of incidents and identifying contributing factors from incident reports. As dataset, we considered 10,063 messages from CIRRNET®, the Swiss national database for critical incidents in healthcare. We applied the LLM Gemma-2 to extract events, causes and contributing factors and group them along themes. 100 event reports were assessed manually regarding quality of extraction. Events were extracted with 92% accuracy, causes with 84% and contributing factors with 72% accuracy. Extraction of contributing factors fails as the LLM hallucinates or interprets. We conclude that LLMs show potential in analysing incident reports and can improve the efficiency and consistency of incident analysis.

BFH: ARBOR
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.