Spatio-temporal responses of ecological resilience to urbanization in five Great Lakes Regions (GLRs) in China and implications for building resilient GLRs

• Ecological resilience in five Great Lakes regions in China shows a center–periphery decline. • Urbanization negatively impacts ecological resilience, with a negative spillover effect. • Beyond 81 km from central lakes, urbanization’s negative impact decreases by 55 %. • Spatial regulation via the “whole–periphery–lakeside” model is vital for resilience. Great Lakes Regions (GLRs) in China often confront landscape fragmentation, wetland degradation, and ecological resilience (ER) losses owing to extensive and intensive urbanization. In GLRs, however, the ER responses to urbanization remain unclear. This study explored the spatiotemporal evolution of ER and urbanization five GLRs in China to analyze the ER dynamic patterns along center−lakeside−periphery. The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) and panel threshold model (PTM) were combined to reveal the spillover and threshold effects of urbanization in five GLRs. The results indicate that the ER in five GLRs declined with a rate of 21 % from 2000 to 2020. There was a clear “center-periphery” contraction trend with low ER areas primarily spreading to human activity-concentrated regions such as lakesides, riversides, and road networks. Driven by economic and land urbanization, the average urbanization level increased from 0.06 to 0.13, where lakesides, riversides, and road networks were key areas undergoing expansion. The urbanization showed a noticeable negative spatial spillover effect on ER. Away from central lakes, the negative impacts on ER exhibited a two-phase decrease with the threshold of 81 km. This study contributes to the understanding of human-environment interactions by examining the ecological resilience response process of GLRs under the impact of urbanization. Based on a multidimensional “whole−periphery−lakeside” analytical model, this study provides a strategic framework for ecological construction in GLRs in China, promoting sustainable development and adaptive capacity in vulnerable areas.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and sustainability
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100395
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatio-temporal responses of ecological resilience to urbanization in five Great Lakes Regions (GLRs) in China and implications for building resilient GLRs

Geography and sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Spatio-temporal responses of ecological resilience to urbanization in five Great Lakes Regions (GLRs) in China and implications for building resilient GLRs

article en

Abstract

• Ecological resilience in five Great Lakes regions in China shows a center–periphery decline. • Urbanization negatively impacts ecological resilience, with a negative spillover effect. • Beyond 81 km from central lakes, urbanization’s negative impact decreases by 55 %. • Spatial regulation via the “whole–periphery–lakeside” model is vital for resilience. Great Lakes Regions (GLRs) in China often confront landscape fragmentation, wetland degradation, and ecological resilience (ER) losses owing to extensive and intensive urbanization. In GLRs, however, the ER responses to urbanization remain unclear. This study explored the spatiotemporal evolution of ER and urbanization five GLRs in China to analyze the ER dynamic patterns along center−lakeside−periphery. The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) and panel threshold model (PTM) were combined to reveal the spillover and threshold effects of urbanization in five GLRs. The results indicate that the ER in five GLRs declined with a rate of 21 % from 2000 to 2020. There was a clear “center-periphery” contraction trend with low ER areas primarily spreading to human activity-concentrated regions such as lakesides, riversides, and road networks. Driven by economic and land urbanization, the average urbanization level increased from 0.06 to 0.13, where lakesides, riversides, and road networks were key areas undergoing expansion. The urbanization showed a noticeable negative spatial spillover effect on ER. Away from central lakes, the negative impacts on ER exhibited a two-phase decrease with the threshold of 81 km. This study contributes to the understanding of human-environment interactions by examining the ecological resilience response process of GLRs under the impact of urbanization. Based on a multidimensional “whole−periphery−lakeside” analytical model, this study provides a strategic framework for ecological construction in GLRs in China, promoting sustainable development and adaptive capacity in vulnerable areas.

Geography and sustainabilityVol. 7(1)
Nanchang University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Xiamen University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), Wuhan University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.