Land use dynamics and the fate of indigenous culture in China’s cultural ecological protection areas

• A nov method is applied to evaluate protected areas’ contribution to culture. • Over 36 % of threatened PAs are located in significant indigenous regions. • 86 % of threatened indigenous PAs have medicinal cultures at risk potentially. • Indigenous PAs face greater challenges from climate change and policy uncertainties. • There is an urgent need to align ecological and cultural diversity with SDGs. With the global expansion of protected areas (PAs) and increasing involvement of indigenous communities, understanding their impacts on indigenous peoples is crucial. This study evaluates the extent to which China’s national cultural ecological protection areas (CEPAs) safeguard indigenous culture, using land-use disturbance as a key metric to assess impacts on cultural keystone species (CKS). We employ a multi-step evaluation framework that reclassifies land use, identifies environment-dependent CKS, and analyzes land-use dynamics by comparing disturbances before and after CEPAs establishment. Our results reveal that, despite overall improvements in land conditions, over 36 % of all CEPAs are in land disturbance threat or warning status and all of these are indigenous CEPAs, indicating a disproportionate disturbance burden on indigenous communities. Notably, traditional medicinal practices are particularly vulnerable. These findings underscore the urgent need for policies aligning ecological diversity with cultural diversity to support the global commitment to expand PAs to over 30 % of Earth’s land and oceans by 2030.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and sustainability
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100390
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land use dynamics and the fate of indigenous culture in China’s cultural ecological protection areas

Geography and sustainability
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Land use dynamics and the fate of indigenous culture in China’s cultural ecological protection areas

article en

Abstract

• A nov method is applied to evaluate protected areas’ contribution to culture. • Over 36 % of threatened PAs are located in significant indigenous regions. • 86 % of threatened indigenous PAs have medicinal cultures at risk potentially. • Indigenous PAs face greater challenges from climate change and policy uncertainties. • There is an urgent need to align ecological and cultural diversity with SDGs. With the global expansion of protected areas (PAs) and increasing involvement of indigenous communities, understanding their impacts on indigenous peoples is crucial. This study evaluates the extent to which China’s national cultural ecological protection areas (CEPAs) safeguard indigenous culture, using land-use disturbance as a key metric to assess impacts on cultural keystone species (CKS). We employ a multi-step evaluation framework that reclassifies land use, identifies environment-dependent CKS, and analyzes land-use dynamics by comparing disturbances before and after CEPAs establishment. Our results reveal that, despite overall improvements in land conditions, over 36 % of all CEPAs are in land disturbance threat or warning status and all of these are indigenous CEPAs, indicating a disproportionate disturbance burden on indigenous communities. Notably, traditional medicinal practices are particularly vulnerable. These findings underscore the urgent need for policies aligning ecological diversity with cultural diversity to support the global commitment to expand PAs to over 30 % of Earth’s land and oceans by 2030.

Geography and sustainabilityVol. 7(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guizhou Minzu University (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.