East Surgical Ward Enteric Perforation Score: A Novel Scoring System for Swift Decision in Enteric Perforation

Background: For enteric perforation the ESWEP Score is a metric designed to determine whether to perform ileostomy or primary closure. The Objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of primary repair and ileostomy in regard to ESWEP score and effectiveness of ESWEP score in both surgical methods. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was carried out at surgical department of LUMHS, Jamshoro for 06 months from January 2024 to June 2024. 52 individuals fulfilling the criteria were selected and grouped as PR (Primary Repair) and PR+1 (ileostomy). Preoperative ESWEP score was calculated and based on a cut off of 13 the patients with a score of 13 underwent PR and those with a score 13 underwent PR with ileostomy. Per-operative findings observed and outcomes were analysed. Results: Mean ages of the patients in the PR group were 36 8.14 years and in the PR+I group were 37 9.23 years. The mean pre-operative ESWEP score in the PR group was 5 0.78 and in the PR+I group was 16 1.72. The mean per-operative ESWEP score in the PR group was 6 0.77 and in the PR+I group it was 14 4.17. The mean total ESWEP score in PR group was 11 1.23 and in the PR+I group it was 30 4.06. Surgery related and systemic complications were significantly less in the PR group. Conclusion: This study concluded that ESWEP score in patients with typhoid perforation was a useful guide for the surgeons for making decisions regarding PR alone or primary repair with ileostomy and PR alone.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/019
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

East Surgical Ward Enteric Perforation Score: A Novel Scoring System for Swift Decision in Enteric Perforation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

East Surgical Ward Enteric Perforation Score: A Novel Scoring System for Swift Decision in Enteric Perforation

article en

Abstract

Background: For enteric perforation the ESWEP Score is a metric designed to determine whether to perform ileostomy or primary closure. The Objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of primary repair and ileostomy in regard to ESWEP score and effectiveness of ESWEP score in both surgical methods. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was carried out at surgical department of LUMHS, Jamshoro for 06 months from January 2024 to June 2024. 52 individuals fulfilling the criteria were selected and grouped as PR (Primary Repair) and PR+1 (ileostomy). Preoperative ESWEP score was calculated and based on a cut off of 13 the patients with a score of 13 underwent PR and those with a score 13 underwent PR with ileostomy. Per-operative findings observed and outcomes were analysed. Results: Mean ages of the patients in the PR group were 36 8.14 years and in the PR+I group were 37 9.23 years. The mean pre-operative ESWEP score in the PR group was 5 0.78 and in the PR+I group was 16 1.72. The mean per-operative ESWEP score in the PR group was 6 0.77 and in the PR+I group it was 14 4.17. The mean total ESWEP score in PR group was 11 1.23 and in the PR+I group it was 30 4.06. Surgery related and systemic complications were significantly less in the PR group. Conclusion: This study concluded that ESWEP score in patients with typhoid perforation was a useful guide for the surgeons for making decisions regarding PR alone or primary repair with ileostomy and PR alone.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Sindh (PK), Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (PK), Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology (PK), Mirpur University of Science and Technology (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.