Neither here nor there: exploring the practical implications of altering the midpoint in survey research

Purpose While controversies regarding the use of midpoint in Likert scale measurements pervade in survey research, the existing literature mainly focuses on confirmatory analyses aiming to assess effects on scale reliability and factorial structure. The consequences of midpoint removal in predictive contexts – which serve as the primary foundation for practical interventions – remain underexplored. We investigate this concern by delving into the stability of the statistical properties of three prediction models built upon the Theory of Planned Behavior framework, by simulating scenarios with and without a midpoint in survey data originally measured on a 7-point Likert scale. Design/methodology/approach We conduct 5,000 partial-least-squares regression models to simulate the effects of the replacement of the midpoint responses in the original datasets based on several replacement rules with psychological plausibility. We compare the results of the original models with the results of the 5,000 simulations. Findings Reduced scales lead to a lower degree of measurement reliability and a lower explanatory power of the models. The statistical significance of predictors is affected under some replacement scenarios. The estimated coefficients also change, to the point that the importance of the independent variables in the original model differs from the one obtained in simulated data. Also, the statistical significance of the predictors, as recommended by the Theory of Planned Behavior, is unstable, and the estimated coefficients of the 5,000 simulation models tend to either overestimate or underestimate the original coefficients. Research limitations/implications We raise awareness that although building survey research on a strong and stable theoretical background is necessary, it may not be sufficient in practical contexts. If the research design is not properly calibrated in terms of measurement, unreliable results may serve as grounds for costly, but likely inefficient, practical interventions. Originality/value Unlike previous research focused on testing the effects of the midpoint on the reliability of a scale and its factorial structure, all driven by confirmatory analysis aiming to test the conformity of the data with a specific theory, we explore potential effects of the midpoint removal in predictive settings, often used in practical interventions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kybernetes
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/k-04-2024-1115
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neither here nor there: exploring the practical implications of altering the midpoint in survey research

Kybernetes
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Neither here nor there: exploring the practical implications of altering the midpoint in survey research

article en

Abstract

Purpose While controversies regarding the use of midpoint in Likert scale measurements pervade in survey research, the existing literature mainly focuses on confirmatory analyses aiming to assess effects on scale reliability and factorial structure. The consequences of midpoint removal in predictive contexts – which serve as the primary foundation for practical interventions – remain underexplored. We investigate this concern by delving into the stability of the statistical properties of three prediction models built upon the Theory of Planned Behavior framework, by simulating scenarios with and without a midpoint in survey data originally measured on a 7-point Likert scale. Design/methodology/approach We conduct 5,000 partial-least-squares regression models to simulate the effects of the replacement of the midpoint responses in the original datasets based on several replacement rules with psychological plausibility. We compare the results of the original models with the results of the 5,000 simulations. Findings Reduced scales lead to a lower degree of measurement reliability and a lower explanatory power of the models. The statistical significance of predictors is affected under some replacement scenarios. The estimated coefficients also change, to the point that the importance of the independent variables in the original model differs from the one obtained in simulated data. Also, the statistical significance of the predictors, as recommended by the Theory of Planned Behavior, is unstable, and the estimated coefficients of the 5,000 simulation models tend to either overestimate or underestimate the original coefficients. Research limitations/implications We raise awareness that although building survey research on a strong and stable theoretical background is necessary, it may not be sufficient in practical contexts. If the research design is not properly calibrated in terms of measurement, unreliable results may serve as grounds for costly, but likely inefficient, practical interventions. Originality/value Unlike previous research focused on testing the effects of the midpoint on the reliability of a scale and its factorial structure, all driven by confirmatory analysis aiming to test the conformity of the data with a specific theory, we explore potential effects of the midpoint removal in predictive settings, often used in practical interventions.

Kybernetes
Quantitative BioSciences (US), California State Polytechnic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.