GTUD Rotation as Josephson Phase: Calibrating G = E² (Δθ)² in Macroscopic Quantum‑Tunneling Circuits

We operationalize the GTUD relation G = E² (Δθ)² by identifying Δθ with the Josephson phase excursion Δφ in macroscopic quantum‑tunneling (MQT) circuits. Using the washboard potential U(φ) = −E_J cos φ − (ħ/2e) I φ with effective mass M_φ = C (ħ/2e)² and plasma frequency ω_p(I) = √(2e I_c / ħ C) (1 − I/I_c)^{1/4}, we derive: (i) harmonic small‑angle energy shifts ΔE ≈ ½ M_φ ω_p² (Δφ)²; (ii) an MQT action S_B = (36/5) ΔU/(ħ ω_p) yielding Γ ≈ a ω_p exp(−S_B/ħ) and the sensitivity δ ln Γ ∝ −(Δφ)²; (iii) a SQUID/array additivity criterion based on orthogonality and a Gram‑matrix/Gershgorin bound; and (iv) preregisterable experimental protocols with OU/1/f noise models and uncertainty budgets. We include annotated analytic figures (washboard geometry, ln Γ vs G scaling, additivity envelope, ω_p vs bias) and a JSON prereg schema. This provides a falsifiable metrological embedding of GTUD in the Nobel‑recognized Josephson tunneling framework (Martinis et al., 1985; Devoret et al., 1984–1985).

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17717957
Primary Topic
Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GTUD Rotation as Josephson Phase: Calibrating G = E² (Δθ)² in Macroscopic Quantum‑Tunneling Circuits

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
article

GTUD Rotation as Josephson Phase: Calibrating G = E² (Δθ)² in Macroscopic Quantum‑Tunneling Circuits

article en

Abstract

We operationalize the GTUD relation G = E² (Δθ)² by identifying Δθ with the Josephson phase excursion Δφ in macroscopic quantum‑tunneling (MQT) circuits. Using the washboard potential U(φ) = −E_J cos φ − (ħ/2e) I φ with effective mass M_φ = C (ħ/2e)² and plasma frequency ω_p(I) = √(2e I_c / ħ C) (1 − I/I_c)^{1/4}, we derive: (i) harmonic small‑angle energy shifts ΔE ≈ ½ M_φ ω_p² (Δφ)²; (ii) an MQT action S_B = (36/5) ΔU/(ħ ω_p) yielding Γ ≈ a ω_p exp(−S_B/ħ) and the sensitivity δ ln Γ ∝ −(Δφ)²; (iii) a SQUID/array additivity criterion based on orthogonality and a Gram‑matrix/Gershgorin bound; and (iv) preregisterable experimental protocols with OU/1/f noise models and uncertainty budgets. We include annotated analytic figures (washboard geometry, ln Γ vs G scaling, additivity envelope, ω_p vs bias) and a JSON prereg schema. This provides a falsifiable metrological embedding of GTUD in the Nobel‑recognized Josephson tunneling framework (Martinis et al., 1985; Devoret et al., 1984–1985).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.