The Mechanism of Manipulation: Dynamically-Stabilized Certainty Traps and Strategic Frame Control

This paper develops a general mechanism by which a strategic actor can actively engineer and sustain dynamically-stabilized certainty traps (DSCTs) against an adaptive, prediction-error learner. When a sender can choose payoff frames ex post after observing receiver actions, they can dose intermittent rewards to regulate temporal-difference residuals at an exploitative indifference point, thereby maintaining a self-confirming equilibrium that resists falsification. The paper formalizes DSCT as a closed-loop control process, generalizes the mechanism across the class of prediction-error learners, and links it to equilibrium concepts in game theory. It demonstrates how DSCT dynamics arise in institutional and algorithmic environments—such as digital platforms and reinforcement learning from human feedback—where powerful principals can shift operative payoff mappings after the fact. The analysis includes theoretical results, computational evidence, detection signatures, and implications for AI alignment, platform governance, and institutional design.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17725449
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mechanism of Manipulation: Dynamically-Stabilized Certainty Traps and Strategic Frame Control

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Game Theory and Applications
article

The Mechanism of Manipulation: Dynamically-Stabilized Certainty Traps and Strategic Frame Control

article en

Abstract

This paper develops a general mechanism by which a strategic actor can actively engineer and sustain dynamically-stabilized certainty traps (DSCTs) against an adaptive, prediction-error learner. When a sender can choose payoff frames ex post after observing receiver actions, they can dose intermittent rewards to regulate temporal-difference residuals at an exploitative indifference point, thereby maintaining a self-confirming equilibrium that resists falsification. The paper formalizes DSCT as a closed-loop control process, generalizes the mechanism across the class of prediction-error learners, and links it to equilibrium concepts in game theory. It demonstrates how DSCT dynamics arise in institutional and algorithmic environments—such as digital platforms and reinforcement learning from human feedback—where powerful principals can shift operative payoff mappings after the fact. The analysis includes theoretical results, computational evidence, detection signatures, and implications for AI alignment, platform governance, and institutional design.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.