A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification: General Approaches and Environmental Applications

The field of Machine Learning has seen rapid advancement from 2022 to 2025 due to more cutting-edge computational tools, hybrid models and improved specified techniques. This review has been written to assess the widely used classification algorithms, such as traditional, ensemble-based and deep learning. It evaluates their performance in practical applications. The search covered five open learning databases, which are: Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, DOAJ and ResearchGate. 57 studies published between 2022 and 2025 met the selection criteria. Findings show that Random Forests and XGBoost are effective for structured datasets, and CNNs and transformers are more suitable for unstructured datasets. Hybrid deep learning ensembles are more stable as they can capture spatial and temporal patterns. This review provides a summary of the results, including a comparison table and an outline of areas that require further work.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17721945
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification: General Approaches and Environmental Applications

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification: General Approaches and Environmental Applications

article en

Abstract

The field of Machine Learning has seen rapid advancement from 2022 to 2025 due to more cutting-edge computational tools, hybrid models and improved specified techniques. This review has been written to assess the widely used classification algorithms, such as traditional, ensemble-based and deep learning. It evaluates their performance in practical applications. The search covered five open learning databases, which are: Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, DOAJ and ResearchGate. 57 studies published between 2022 and 2025 met the selection criteria. Findings show that Random Forests and XGBoost are effective for structured datasets, and CNNs and transformers are more suitable for unstructured datasets. Hybrid deep learning ensembles are more stable as they can capture spatial and temporal patterns. This review provides a summary of the results, including a comparison table and an outline of areas that require further work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification: General Approaches and Environmental Applications · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS