Clinical outcomes of burned patients receiving early enteral immunonutrition: A retrospective analysis

<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background & aims</h3> Burn patients are characterised by profound oxidative stress, intense inflammation, and prolonged hypermetabolic and catabolic states proportional to injury severity. Immunonutrition, incorporating substrates such as arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and ribonucleotides, has shown advantages in regulating immune responses and minimizing complications across various patient populations, providing the rationale for its application in severely burned patients. This study compared outcomes between early enteral immunonutrition (iEN) and standard enteral or parenteral nutrition. <h3>Methods</h3> A retrospective observational study was carried out on 114 adult patients with severe burns (age >18 years, total body surface area [BSA] >20%). Patients were divided into an iEN group (n=51; initiation within 48 hours of admission) and a control group (n=63). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups, including prognostic severity, using the Baux index. Overall in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included the duration of hospital stay, onset of sepsis, and mortality rate stratified by the Baux index. <h3>Results</h3> The average age of the included patients was 61.2 ± 21 years in the iEN group, compared to 61.7 ± 18 years in the control group. The iEN group had a higher baseline severity (mean Baux index 120 ± 30.5 vs. 110 ± 34 in the control group). Patients receiving iEN demonstrated a lower overall mortality rate (49% vs. 55.6% in the control group) and a delayed onset of sepsis (mean 9.2 ± 7.1 days vs. 4.9 ± 3.7 days). Among patients with a Baux index >100, the mortality rate was reduced in the iEN group (64.1% vs. 77.5% in controls). <h3>Conclusions</h3> iEN appears to improve survival and delay sepsis onset in patients with severe burns, particularly in those with higher baseline severity. These findings highlight the potential of iEN to modulate immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in this population. Further research is warranted to confirm our findings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutos.2025.11.010
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of burned patients receiving early enteral immunonutrition: A retrospective analysis

Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Clinical outcomes of burned patients receiving early enteral immunonutrition: A retrospective analysis

article en

Abstract

<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background & aims</h3> Burn patients are characterised by profound oxidative stress, intense inflammation, and prolonged hypermetabolic and catabolic states proportional to injury severity. Immunonutrition, incorporating substrates such as arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and ribonucleotides, has shown advantages in regulating immune responses and minimizing complications across various patient populations, providing the rationale for its application in severely burned patients. This study compared outcomes between early enteral immunonutrition (iEN) and standard enteral or parenteral nutrition. <h3>Methods</h3> A retrospective observational study was carried out on 114 adult patients with severe burns (age >18 years, total body surface area [BSA] >20%). Patients were divided into an iEN group (n=51; initiation within 48 hours of admission) and a control group (n=63). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups, including prognostic severity, using the Baux index. Overall in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included the duration of hospital stay, onset of sepsis, and mortality rate stratified by the Baux index. <h3>Results</h3> The average age of the included patients was 61.2 ± 21 years in the iEN group, compared to 61.7 ± 18 years in the control group. The iEN group had a higher baseline severity (mean Baux index 120 ± 30.5 vs. 110 ± 34 in the control group). Patients receiving iEN demonstrated a lower overall mortality rate (49% vs. 55.6% in the control group) and a delayed onset of sepsis (mean 9.2 ± 7.1 days vs. 4.9 ± 3.7 days). Among patients with a Baux index >100, the mortality rate was reduced in the iEN group (64.1% vs. 77.5% in controls). <h3>Conclusions</h3> iEN appears to improve survival and delay sepsis onset in patients with severe burns, particularly in those with higher baseline severity. These findings highlight the potential of iEN to modulate immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in this population. Further research is warranted to confirm our findings.

Clinical Nutrition Open ScienceVol. 66
University of Catania (IT), Centro Clinico Nemo (IT), Environment Park (IT), Villa Torri Hospital (IT), Methodist University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.