Globalization and Its Political Interpretation: Marxist Critique vs Liberal Support

Globalization has emerged as one of the most transformative forces influencing contemporary political, economic and cultural relations across the world. Liberal scholars portray globalization as a catalyst for economic growth, technological advancement, the free flow of information and enhanced international cooperation, arguing that global integration promotes peace and shared prosperity. In contrast, Marxist theorists interpret globalization as a modern mechanism for capitalist expansion, reproducing economic exploitation, labour suppression and dependency of developing societies on dominant capitalist powers. This research paper investigates the political interpretations of globalization through both liberal and Marxist frameworks, critically examining their core assumptions, points of convergence, areas of divergence and limitations. The study concludes that although globalization creates immense opportunities for innovation, trade and development, it simultaneously reinforces structural inequalities at national and global levels. Therefore, the paper argues that effective regulatory frameworks and equitable distribution of global benefits are essential to achieve a just and inclusive global order.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17719827
Primary Topic
Globalization and Cultural Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Globalization and Its Political Interpretation: Marxist Critique vs Liberal Support

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Globalization and Cultural Identity
article

Globalization and Its Political Interpretation: Marxist Critique vs Liberal Support

article en

Abstract

Globalization has emerged as one of the most transformative forces influencing contemporary political, economic and cultural relations across the world. Liberal scholars portray globalization as a catalyst for economic growth, technological advancement, the free flow of information and enhanced international cooperation, arguing that global integration promotes peace and shared prosperity. In contrast, Marxist theorists interpret globalization as a modern mechanism for capitalist expansion, reproducing economic exploitation, labour suppression and dependency of developing societies on dominant capitalist powers. This research paper investigates the political interpretations of globalization through both liberal and Marxist frameworks, critically examining their core assumptions, points of convergence, areas of divergence and limitations. The study concludes that although globalization creates immense opportunities for innovation, trade and development, it simultaneously reinforces structural inequalities at national and global levels. Therefore, the paper argues that effective regulatory frameworks and equitable distribution of global benefits are essential to achieve a just and inclusive global order.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Barkatullah University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Globalization and Cultural Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Globalization and Its Political Interpretation: Marxist Critique vs Liberal Support · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS