Inlet Ground Vortex Investigation and Effect of Numerical Modeling strategies

Computational fluid dynamics is used to compare numerical results with experiments for an engine intake wind tunnel model near the ground, where its inlet mass flow and ambient crosswind produce a ground vortex. The cases studied are based on three different crosswind experimental results. A mesh refinement study was made to determine a mesh with localized refinement that resulted in a computational cost reduction of 4–10 times in comparison with the initial meshes. Two different turbulence models were tested: the realizable [Formula: see text], which has consistently produced more stable steady-state results, and the shear stress transport model, which has been more sensitive to flow unsteadiness. Unsteady runs have shown that steady runs may produce a ground vortex with similar intensity and ground movement path. Higher velocity cases, where the ground vortex is combined with a large inlet separation region, have shown good qualitative agreement with experiment despite being more challenged to meet the distortion and circulation metrics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038459
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inlet Ground Vortex Investigation and Effect of Numerical Modeling strategies

Journal of Aircraft
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Inlet Ground Vortex Investigation and Effect of Numerical Modeling strategies

article en

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics is used to compare numerical results with experiments for an engine intake wind tunnel model near the ground, where its inlet mass flow and ambient crosswind produce a ground vortex. The cases studied are based on three different crosswind experimental results. A mesh refinement study was made to determine a mesh with localized refinement that resulted in a computational cost reduction of 4–10 times in comparison with the initial meshes. Two different turbulence models were tested: the realizable [Formula: see text], which has consistently produced more stable steady-state results, and the shear stress transport model, which has been more sensitive to flow unsteadiness. Unsteady runs have shown that steady runs may produce a ground vortex with similar intensity and ground movement path. Higher velocity cases, where the ground vortex is combined with a large inlet separation region, have shown good qualitative agreement with experiment despite being more challenged to meet the distortion and circulation metrics.

Journal of Aircraft
Embraer (Brazil) (BR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inlet Ground Vortex Investigation and Effect of Numerical Modeling strategies · Journal of Aircraft (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS