Methodological and tool-based decision support framework for a sustainable end-of-life management of products

The pursuit of a Circular Economy (CE) has gained prominence among policymakers and society, driven by the urgent need to reduce environmental degradation and resource depletion. The CE places emphasis on the end-of-life (EOL) phase of products and the choice of management strategies, which range from non-circular options such as landfilling to more circular approaches including reuse, recycling, and recovery. This paper proposes a methodological framework, supported by practical tools, to guide the selection of EOL strategies that extend beyond circularity to embrace a holistic approach to sustainability. The framework consists of four stages, each accompanied by appropriate tools, and assesses options across the entire product lifecycle, taking into account the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. Applied to a case study involving laundry detergent packaging, the framework revealed that, in certain cases, strategies with lower levels of circularity can lead to better sustainability outcomes than more circular alternatives. These findings challenge the commonly held belief that higher circularity inherently represents the best choice. By integrating life cycle thinking and a multidimensional assessment that considers the three pillars of sustainability—environmental, economic, and social—this research highlights the importance of rigorous, context-sensitive analysis in end-of-life decision-making. The proposed framework offers a practical and adaptable tool for stakeholders seeking to implement sustainable EOL strategies in line with CE principles. • End-of-life management approach choice is a multi-criteria decision-making problem. • A solution with the highest level of circularity is not always the most sustainable. • The sustainability criterion should take precedence over the circularity criterion. • All life-cycle phases and all dimensions of sustainability must be considered. • An operational decision support framework is proposed to assist in selecting the most sustainable option.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147137
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological and tool-based decision support framework for a sustainable end-of-life management of products

Journal of Cleaner Production
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Methodological and tool-based decision support framework for a sustainable end-of-life management of products

article en

Abstract

The pursuit of a Circular Economy (CE) has gained prominence among policymakers and society, driven by the urgent need to reduce environmental degradation and resource depletion. The CE places emphasis on the end-of-life (EOL) phase of products and the choice of management strategies, which range from non-circular options such as landfilling to more circular approaches including reuse, recycling, and recovery. This paper proposes a methodological framework, supported by practical tools, to guide the selection of EOL strategies that extend beyond circularity to embrace a holistic approach to sustainability. The framework consists of four stages, each accompanied by appropriate tools, and assesses options across the entire product lifecycle, taking into account the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. Applied to a case study involving laundry detergent packaging, the framework revealed that, in certain cases, strategies with lower levels of circularity can lead to better sustainability outcomes than more circular alternatives. These findings challenge the commonly held belief that higher circularity inherently represents the best choice. By integrating life cycle thinking and a multidimensional assessment that considers the three pillars of sustainability—environmental, economic, and social—this research highlights the importance of rigorous, context-sensitive analysis in end-of-life decision-making. The proposed framework offers a practical and adaptable tool for stakeholders seeking to implement sustainable EOL strategies in line with CE principles. • End-of-life management approach choice is a multi-criteria decision-making problem. • A solution with the highest level of circularity is not always the most sustainable. • The sustainability criterion should take precedence over the circularity criterion. • All life-cycle phases and all dimensions of sustainability must be considered. • An operational decision support framework is proposed to assist in selecting the most sustainable option.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 536
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT), Institut Supérieur de Mécanique de Paris (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.