Safe areas for mini-implant placement in orthodontics: Bibliographic review

Orthodontic anchorage using mini-implants has established itself as an effective means of optimizing biomechanical control during orthodontic treatment. However, its success largely depends on the selection of the insertion site, as an inappropriate location can compromise anatomical structures and decrease primary stability. The purpose of this review was to identify the safest areas for mini-implant placement, integrating evidence published between 2010 and 2025. Studies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), anatomical analyses, and systematic reviews that evaluated interradicular spaces, cortical thickness, and variations according to age, sex, and skeletal pattern were included. The results show that, in the maxilla, the safest interradicular spaces are located between the second premolar and first molar, as well as between the first and second molars on the buccal surface; in the anterior region, the appropriate site is between the central and lateral incisors, 6 mm from the cementoenamel junction. In the mandible, the preferred site is between the first and second molars, 6 mm or more apically, and in the anterior region, between the lateral incisor and canine. The paramedian region of the palate, especially between the first and second premolars, provides the thickest cortex and the greatest stability. Extra-alveolar alternatives include the infrazygomatic crest and the mandibular buccal cortex. In conclusion, although safe sites exist, mini-implant stability is influenced by individual anatomical factors, so individualized CBCT planning is recommended.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17722075
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe areas for mini-implant placement in orthodontics: Bibliographic review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Safe areas for mini-implant placement in orthodontics: Bibliographic review

article en

Abstract

Orthodontic anchorage using mini-implants has established itself as an effective means of optimizing biomechanical control during orthodontic treatment. However, its success largely depends on the selection of the insertion site, as an inappropriate location can compromise anatomical structures and decrease primary stability. The purpose of this review was to identify the safest areas for mini-implant placement, integrating evidence published between 2010 and 2025. Studies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), anatomical analyses, and systematic reviews that evaluated interradicular spaces, cortical thickness, and variations according to age, sex, and skeletal pattern were included. The results show that, in the maxilla, the safest interradicular spaces are located between the second premolar and first molar, as well as between the first and second molars on the buccal surface; in the anterior region, the appropriate site is between the central and lateral incisors, 6 mm from the cementoenamel junction. In the mandible, the preferred site is between the first and second molars, 6 mm or more apically, and in the anterior region, between the lateral incisor and canine. The paramedian region of the palate, especially between the first and second premolars, provides the thickest cortex and the greatest stability. Extra-alveolar alternatives include the infrazygomatic crest and the mandibular buccal cortex. In conclusion, although safe sites exist, mini-implant stability is influenced by individual anatomical factors, so individualized CBCT planning is recommended.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Cuenca (EC)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.