Absence of Anti-C1q Antibodies in C1q Nephropathy: Evidence for a Distinct Pathogenic Mechanism from Lupus Nephritis

Background: C1q nephropathy (C1qN) and lupus nephritis (LN) both feature C1q deposition in glomeruli, yet there remains great debate regarding the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic distinctions between these two glomerular diseases, particularly with mesangioproliferative LN. Anti-C1q antibodies have been implicated in the pathophysiology and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly high activity lupus nephritis. Whether these antibodies are also present in C1qN, a condition defined by C1q deposition in the absence of systemic lupus, remains unclear. Methods: We conducted an analysis of serum anti-C1q antibody levels in biopsy-proven C1qN (n = 11) and class IV LN (n = 9) patients, identified from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill nephropathology biorepository. Anti-C1q antibody levels were measured using a standardized ELISA method, with positivity defined per manufacturer’s thresholds. Internal controls with known negative SLE samples and known positive SLE samples were used. Clinical and histopathologic data were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and exclude overlap with SLE in C1qN cases. Results: None of the patients with C1q nephropathy (n = 11) demonstrated detectable anti-C1q antibodies. In contrast, eight patients with class IV lupus nephritis (n = 9) tested positive for anti-C1q antibodies. The internal controls were in agreement with the manufacturer control samples. This stark contrast persisted despite histologic similarity in glomerular C1q deposition, and all C1qN patients met clinical and serologic criteria excluding SLE. Conclusion: This is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate anti-C1q antibodies in C1qN patients. Though these were small sample sizes, our findings demonstrate that anti-C1q antibodies are consistently absent in C1q nephropathy, while predominantly present in class IV lupus nephritis. This suggests a distinct immunopathologic mechanism in C1qN, despite the shared immunophenotypic hallmark of glomerular C1q deposition. The absence of anti-C1q antibodies may serve as a useful biomarker to help distinguish C1q nephropathy from lupus nephritis in diagnostically challenging cases.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20258x849ng5
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Absence of Anti-C1q Antibodies in C1q Nephropathy: Evidence for a Distinct Pathogenic Mechanism from Lupus Nephritis

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Absence of Anti-C1q Antibodies in C1q Nephropathy: Evidence for a Distinct Pathogenic Mechanism from Lupus Nephritis

article en

Abstract

Background: C1q nephropathy (C1qN) and lupus nephritis (LN) both feature C1q deposition in glomeruli, yet there remains great debate regarding the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic distinctions between these two glomerular diseases, particularly with mesangioproliferative LN. Anti-C1q antibodies have been implicated in the pathophysiology and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly high activity lupus nephritis. Whether these antibodies are also present in C1qN, a condition defined by C1q deposition in the absence of systemic lupus, remains unclear. Methods: We conducted an analysis of serum anti-C1q antibody levels in biopsy-proven C1qN (n = 11) and class IV LN (n = 9) patients, identified from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill nephropathology biorepository. Anti-C1q antibody levels were measured using a standardized ELISA method, with positivity defined per manufacturer’s thresholds. Internal controls with known negative SLE samples and known positive SLE samples were used. Clinical and histopathologic data were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and exclude overlap with SLE in C1qN cases. Results: None of the patients with C1q nephropathy (n = 11) demonstrated detectable anti-C1q antibodies. In contrast, eight patients with class IV lupus nephritis (n = 9) tested positive for anti-C1q antibodies. The internal controls were in agreement with the manufacturer control samples. This stark contrast persisted despite histologic similarity in glomerular C1q deposition, and all C1qN patients met clinical and serologic criteria excluding SLE. Conclusion: This is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate anti-C1q antibodies in C1qN patients. Though these were small sample sizes, our findings demonstrate that anti-C1q antibodies are consistently absent in C1q nephropathy, while predominantly present in class IV lupus nephritis. This suggests a distinct immunopathologic mechanism in C1qN, despite the shared immunophenotypic hallmark of glomerular C1q deposition. The absence of anti-C1q antibodies may serve as a useful biomarker to help distinguish C1q nephropathy from lupus nephritis in diagnostically challenging cases.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Absence of Anti-C1q Antibodies in C1q Nephropathy: Evidence for a Distinct Pathogenic Mechanism from Lupus Nephritis · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS