Sustainability assessment: the state of the art in 2026

Sustainability Assessment (SA) has developed over the past three decades as a decision-support process explicitly directing choices towards sustainability. This paper provides an updated state-of-the-art review of SA in 2025, building on the 2012 assessment by Bond, Morrison-Saunders and Pope. We examine progress in theory, practice and process across selected jurisdictions, considering how SA has evolved conceptually and in application. While the volume of academic research on SA continues to grow, practical uptake remains uneven and context-dependent. Key innovations shaping the field include the embedding of sustainability provisions within Canada’s next generation impact assessment framework, the incorporation of holistic assessment principles in Western Australia, the global adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the rise of sustainable finance taxonomies. Together, these developments sharpen debates about definitions, scope, and trade-offs inherent in SA, highlighting both its strengths—such as integrated treatment of cumulative effects—and weaknesses, including costs, jurisdictional constraints, and challenges of transdisciplinarity. Opportunities exist to enhance SA through improved design, cross-jurisdictional cooperation, and clearer sustainability benchmarks, but threats remain from political pressures to streamline assessment and reduce costs. We conclude by reflecting on the contested future of SA and the need to communicate its value more effectively.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2025.2593204
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability assessment: the state of the art in 2026

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Sustainability assessment: the state of the art in 2026

article en

Abstract

Sustainability Assessment (SA) has developed over the past three decades as a decision-support process explicitly directing choices towards sustainability. This paper provides an updated state-of-the-art review of SA in 2025, building on the 2012 assessment by Bond, Morrison-Saunders and Pope. We examine progress in theory, practice and process across selected jurisdictions, considering how SA has evolved conceptually and in application. While the volume of academic research on SA continues to grow, practical uptake remains uneven and context-dependent. Key innovations shaping the field include the embedding of sustainability provisions within Canada’s next generation impact assessment framework, the incorporation of holistic assessment principles in Western Australia, the global adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the rise of sustainable finance taxonomies. Together, these developments sharpen debates about definitions, scope, and trade-offs inherent in SA, highlighting both its strengths—such as integrated treatment of cumulative effects—and weaknesses, including costs, jurisdictional constraints, and challenges of transdisciplinarity. Opportunities exist to enhance SA through improved design, cross-jurisdictional cooperation, and clearer sustainability benchmarks, but threats remain from political pressures to streamline assessment and reduce costs. We conclude by reflecting on the contested future of SA and the need to communicate its value more effectively.

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
University of East Anglia (GB), Edith Cowan University (AU), North-West University (ZA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.