Leibniz on Justice for Future Generations

Abstract Leibniz’s definition of justice as the charity of the wise suggests obligations to future generations, but Leibniz seldom discusses intergenerational ethics directly. This paper examines what Leibniz’s theory of justice entails for intergenerational ethics by addressing both why we have obligations to the future and what those obligations require. Drawing on Leibniz’s Dialogue entre Theophile et Polidore (1679) and related writings, I reconstruct two arguments Leibniz uses to ground obligations to the common good and to posterity: (1) “the temporal horizon argument” focused on divine recompense and (2) “the perpetual citizenship argument” focused on the commonwealth of minds. I argue that while the first argument implicitly includes care for posterity, the second makes such obligations clearer and more compelling by establishing a transgenerational moral community. The paper concludes by outlining a Leibnizian framework for intergenerational justice, showing how Leibniz balances his commitment to the present with his commitment to progress.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2025-0024
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leibniz on Justice for Future Generations

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Leibniz on Justice for Future Generations

article en

Abstract

Abstract Leibniz’s definition of justice as the charity of the wise suggests obligations to future generations, but Leibniz seldom discusses intergenerational ethics directly. This paper examines what Leibniz’s theory of justice entails for intergenerational ethics by addressing both why we have obligations to the future and what those obligations require. Drawing on Leibniz’s Dialogue entre Theophile et Polidore (1679) and related writings, I reconstruct two arguments Leibniz uses to ground obligations to the common good and to posterity: (1) “the temporal horizon argument” focused on divine recompense and (2) “the perpetual citizenship argument” focused on the commonwealth of minds. I argue that while the first argument implicitly includes care for posterity, the second makes such obligations clearer and more compelling by establishing a transgenerational moral community. The paper concludes by outlining a Leibnizian framework for intergenerational justice, showing how Leibniz balances his commitment to the present with his commitment to progress.

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Carroll College (US)
Emory University, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.