POLITICAL AND BUREAUCRATIC CHALLENGES IN HUMANITARIAN AID COORDINATION AMONG ORGANIZATIONS IN FAKO DIVISION, CAMEROON

This study assessed the influence of political and bureaucratic challenges on the coordination of humanitarian aid among organizations operating in Fako Division, Cameroon. A qualitative research design was employed, using interviews and document analysis to gather data from twenty humanitarian workers drawn from international and local NGOs, United Nations agencies, and government institutions. Thematic analysis revealed that political interference and bureaucratic procedures significantly hinder aid coordination. Political interference was reflected in restricted access, selective authorizations, and political influence over beneficiary targeting, which weakened neutrality and collaboration among agencies. Bureaucratic challenges, including lengthy administrative procedures and duplication of approval systems, delayed project implementation and reduced operational efficiency. However, humanitarian organizations adopted several strategies to manage these constraints, including collaborative engagement with government authorities, strengthening inter-agency networks, and promoting advocacy and policy dialogue. The study recommends that organizations sustain structured engagement with government bodies, the Cameroonian authorities streamline administrative processes, and inter-agency advocacy be reinforced to safeguard humanitarian neutrality and improve coordination efficiency. The findings highlight the need for cooperation, procedural reform, and consistent dialogue to ensure timely and equitable humanitarian assistance in Fako Division.