Voice Biometric Authentication Using AI : A Comparative Study on Neural Network Robustness to Noise and Spoofing

Voice biometrics is emerging as a secure, intuitive, and contactless method of identity verification, offering key advantages over traditional PIN- or password-based systems. However, its effectiveness is often reduced by real-world factors such as background noise, device variability, and spoofing attacks including replay and synthetic voice input. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three neural network architectures-Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and transformer-based Wav2Vec 2.0-for voice biometric authentication under both clean and adverse conditions. Experiments were conducted using two large-scale datasets, Mozilla Common Voice and VoxCeleb, with audio represented as mel spectrograms, mel-frequency cepstral soefficients (MFCCs), and raw waveforms. Data augmentation included Gaussian noise, reverberation, background speech, and spoofing via text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. Results show that Wav2Vec 2.0 consistently outperforms CNN and LSTM in terms of accuracy, robustness to noise, and partial resistance to spoofing, reaching up to 92% accuracy in clean scenarios. Despite these gains, none of the models proved fully resistant to high-fidelity synthetic voice attacks. To address this, we propose integrating explicit spoof detection modules and adversarial training techniques. Additionally, privacy-preserving frameworks such as federated learning and the use of multimodal biometrics are discussed as future directions for secure and ethical deployment.

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2025.74.10.1731
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voice Biometric Authentication Using AI : A Comparative Study on Neural Network Robustness to Noise and Spoofing

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
article

Voice Biometric Authentication Using AI : A Comparative Study on Neural Network Robustness to Noise and Spoofing

article en

Abstract

Voice biometrics is emerging as a secure, intuitive, and contactless method of identity verification, offering key advantages over traditional PIN- or password-based systems. However, its effectiveness is often reduced by real-world factors such as background noise, device variability, and spoofing attacks including replay and synthetic voice input. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three neural network architectures-Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and transformer-based Wav2Vec 2.0-for voice biometric authentication under both clean and adverse conditions. Experiments were conducted using two large-scale datasets, Mozilla Common Voice and VoxCeleb, with audio represented as mel spectrograms, mel-frequency cepstral soefficients (MFCCs), and raw waveforms. Data augmentation included Gaussian noise, reverberation, background speech, and spoofing via text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. Results show that Wav2Vec 2.0 consistently outperforms CNN and LSTM in terms of accuracy, robustness to noise, and partial resistance to spoofing, reaching up to 92% accuracy in clean scenarios. Despite these gains, none of the models proved fully resistant to high-fidelity synthetic voice attacks. To address this, we propose integrating explicit spoof detection modules and adversarial training techniques. Additionally, privacy-preserving frameworks such as federated learning and the use of multimodal biometrics are discussed as future directions for secure and ethical deployment.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 74(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.