Impact of Crop Insurance on Technology Adoption and Investment in Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Odisha, India

This study examined the impact of crop insurance on farmers' technology adoption and investment behaviour, using data from 120 insured and 120 uninsured farmers in the Jagatsinghpur and Kendrapara districts of Odisha. The results showed that insured farmers generally had larger farms, though over 90 per cent of respondents remained marginal or small. Most farmers accessed loans through cooperative banks, with insured farmers showing a preference for these institutions. Crop insurance benefits included increased awareness of government schemes, financial support during adverse conditions, and protection against crop failure. However, frequent climatic risks discouraged farmers from making significant investments. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) method, the study found minimal differences in agricultural investment between insured and non-insured farmers. A demand-driven strategy focused on young, educated farmers and enhanced extension services could improve adoption and resilience in the face of adversity.

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Economics and Development
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed-24524
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Crop Insurance on Technology Adoption and Investment in Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Odisha, India

Indian Journal of Economics and Development
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Impact of Crop Insurance on Technology Adoption and Investment in Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Odisha, India

article en

Abstract

This study examined the impact of crop insurance on farmers' technology adoption and investment behaviour, using data from 120 insured and 120 uninsured farmers in the Jagatsinghpur and Kendrapara districts of Odisha. The results showed that insured farmers generally had larger farms, though over 90 per cent of respondents remained marginal or small. Most farmers accessed loans through cooperative banks, with insured farmers showing a preference for these institutions. Crop insurance benefits included increased awareness of government schemes, financial support during adverse conditions, and protection against crop failure. However, frequent climatic risks discouraged farmers from making significant investments. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) method, the study found minimal differences in agricultural investment between insured and non-insured farmers. A demand-driven strategy focused on young, educated farmers and enhanced extension services could improve adoption and resilience in the face of adversity.

Indian Journal of Economics and Development
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.