Antimicrobial resistance in clinical wound infections: A study on Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in Imo state, Nigeria

Background: The growing resistance of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial treatments poses a major public health concern, particularly in the treatment of hospital-acquired wound infections.Aim: This study investigated the antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with wound infections in Imo State, Nigeria.Study Design: A total of 76 bacterial isolates, comprising Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were recovered from patients with clinically infected wounds and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of antibiotics representing multiple antibiotic classes, to determine their antimicrobial resistance profiles.Methodology: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method, as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI (2017) guidelines. The isolates were tested against cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones, which include ceftazidime (10μg), ceftriaxone (30μg), cefepime (30μg), imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), colistin (10μg), polymyxin B (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), and levofloxacin (5μg), to determine susceptibility profiles.Results: Findings revealed a high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) among the gram-negative bacterial isolates, with a substantial proportion of isolates exhibiting resistance to three or more antibiotic classes. Specifically, 43.9% (18) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 45.71% (16) of Escherichia coli isolates were identified as MDR.Notably, a significant number of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates exhibited resistance to various antibiotic classes, including cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones. However, carbapenems demonstrated remarkable efficacy, with a significant majority of isolates showing susceptibility — 92.68% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 90% of Escherichia coli isolates.Conclusion: The study highlights the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship and infection control practices to preserve the efficacy of available antibiotics in the treatment of clinical wound infections.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17697649
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antimicrobial resistance in clinical wound infections: A study on Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in Imo state, Nigeria

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Antimicrobial resistance in clinical wound infections: A study on Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in Imo state, Nigeria

article en

Abstract

Background: The growing resistance of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial treatments poses a major public health concern, particularly in the treatment of hospital-acquired wound infections.Aim: This study investigated the antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with wound infections in Imo State, Nigeria.Study Design: A total of 76 bacterial isolates, comprising Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were recovered from patients with clinically infected wounds and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of antibiotics representing multiple antibiotic classes, to determine their antimicrobial resistance profiles.Methodology: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method, as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI (2017) guidelines. The isolates were tested against cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones, which include ceftazidime (10μg), ceftriaxone (30μg), cefepime (30μg), imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), colistin (10μg), polymyxin B (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), and levofloxacin (5μg), to determine susceptibility profiles.Results: Findings revealed a high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) among the gram-negative bacterial isolates, with a substantial proportion of isolates exhibiting resistance to three or more antibiotic classes. Specifically, 43.9% (18) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 45.71% (16) of Escherichia coli isolates were identified as MDR.Notably, a significant number of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates exhibited resistance to various antibiotic classes, including cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones. However, carbapenems demonstrated remarkable efficacy, with a significant majority of isolates showing susceptibility — 92.68% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 90% of Escherichia coli isolates.Conclusion: The study highlights the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship and infection control practices to preserve the efficacy of available antibiotics in the treatment of clinical wound infections.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.