Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into international arbitration raises significant public policy challenges, particularly when AI is used to render arbitral awards autonomously. This paper evaluates the enforceability of AI-generated awards under the 1958 New York Convention (NYC), with particular emphasis on the public policy exception and associated due-process guarantees. It discusses three principal concerns: namely, the requirement that arbitrators be natural persons, the necessity of reasoned awards, and the risk of algorithmic bias compromising impartiality and fairness. Drawing on comparative jurisprudence and emerging soft-law guidance, the analysis demonstrates that, although party autonomy may in principle accommodate technological innovation, prevailing legal frameworks present significant obstacles to recognition and enforcement.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Arbitration
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2025047
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards

Journal of International Arbitration
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards

article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into international arbitration raises significant public policy challenges, particularly when AI is used to render arbitral awards autonomously. This paper evaluates the enforceability of AI-generated awards under the 1958 New York Convention (NYC), with particular emphasis on the public policy exception and associated due-process guarantees. It discusses three principal concerns: namely, the requirement that arbitrators be natural persons, the necessity of reasoned awards, and the risk of algorithmic bias compromising impartiality and fairness. Drawing on comparative jurisprudence and emerging soft-law guidance, the analysis demonstrates that, although party autonomy may in principle accommodate technological innovation, prevailing legal frameworks present significant obstacles to recognition and enforcement.

Journal of International ArbitrationVol. 42(Issue 6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.