Effectiveness of Modified Clear Aligner Attachment Designs on Molar Extrusion: An In Vitro Typodont Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a popular, aesthetic, and comfortable alternative to fixed appliances. Advancement of in-house 3D printing has improved accessibility and customization of aligners. However, their effectiveness in achieving certain tooth movements, particularly extrusion, remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified aligner designs with different attachment configurations in producing extrusion of the upper first molar using typodont models. <b>Methods</b>: An in vitro study was performed with 400 clear aligners fabricated from shape memory polymer (Graphy Tera Harz TC-85DAC) using a Uniz Slash-C LCD 3D printer. Aligners were divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 100 each) based on attachment location: no attachment (G1), buccal (G2), palatal (G3), and combined buccal-palatal (G4). Typodont models were used to simulate clinical conditions. Tooth extrusion, inclination, and angulation were measured using CBCT scans (Veraviewepocs 3D R100) and analyzed with Dolphin 3D imaging software. <b>Results</b>: Tooth movement varied by attachment configuration. G1 showed negligible extrusion. G2 and G3 produced significant vertical and angular changes, particularly in cusp extrusion and buccolingual tipping. G4 achieved the most consistent and statistically significant extrusion, with mean values of 0.97 mm (palatal cusp), 0.87 mm (mesiobuccal cusp), 0.72 mm (distobuccal cusp), and 1.62° mesiodistal tipping. The extrusion detected at the mesiobuccal cusp was 0.27, 0.41, 0.95, and 0.87 in G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively. Buccal-only attachments demonstrated limited effectiveness. <b>Conclusions</b>: Attachment placement significantly affects the efficiency of clear aligners in achieving upper first molar extrusion. Combined buccal and palatal attachments provide superior control of extrusion and tipping movements. Customized attachment strategies may enhance clinical outcomes in CAT.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120551
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Modified Clear Aligner Attachment Designs on Molar Extrusion: An In Vitro Typodont Study

Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Effectiveness of Modified Clear Aligner Attachment Designs on Molar Extrusion: An In Vitro Typodont Study

article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a popular, aesthetic, and comfortable alternative to fixed appliances. Advancement of in-house 3D printing has improved accessibility and customization of aligners. However, their effectiveness in achieving certain tooth movements, particularly extrusion, remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified aligner designs with different attachment configurations in producing extrusion of the upper first molar using typodont models. <b>Methods</b>: An in vitro study was performed with 400 clear aligners fabricated from shape memory polymer (Graphy Tera Harz TC-85DAC) using a Uniz Slash-C LCD 3D printer. Aligners were divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 100 each) based on attachment location: no attachment (G1), buccal (G2), palatal (G3), and combined buccal-palatal (G4). Typodont models were used to simulate clinical conditions. Tooth extrusion, inclination, and angulation were measured using CBCT scans (Veraviewepocs 3D R100) and analyzed with Dolphin 3D imaging software. <b>Results</b>: Tooth movement varied by attachment configuration. G1 showed negligible extrusion. G2 and G3 produced significant vertical and angular changes, particularly in cusp extrusion and buccolingual tipping. G4 achieved the most consistent and statistically significant extrusion, with mean values of 0.97 mm (palatal cusp), 0.87 mm (mesiobuccal cusp), 0.72 mm (distobuccal cusp), and 1.62° mesiodistal tipping. The extrusion detected at the mesiobuccal cusp was 0.27, 0.41, 0.95, and 0.87 in G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively. Buccal-only attachments demonstrated limited effectiveness. <b>Conclusions</b>: Attachment placement significantly affects the efficiency of clear aligners in achieving upper first molar extrusion. Combined buccal and palatal attachments provide superior control of extrusion and tipping movements. Customized attachment strategies may enhance clinical outcomes in CAT.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(12)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE)
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.