Medication use from conception to the first antenatal appointment: agreement between maternal self-report to midwife and prescribing records in Northern Ireland in 2011-2016

IntroductionData reliability must be considered before using administrative healthcare databases to study medication utilisation and safety during pregnancy. ObjectivesTo compare medication use reported by the mother and recorded by midwives at the first antenatal visit in the Northern Ireland (NI) Maternity System (NIMATS) to dispensed prescriptions recorded in the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD). MethodsA population-based linked cohort study including all resident women in NI who gave birth between 01/01/2011 and 31/12/2016. Prescriptions dispensed in the EPD between the last menstrual period and the first antenatal visit were compared to medications recorded in NIMATS. The number and proportion of pregnancies with medications in each data source were calculated along with Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity. ResultsOf the 139,687 pregnancies in NIMATS (106,206 women), 74.3% reported taking medication, including supplements, and 63.5% had prescriptions dispensed (with 86.9% reporting taking medication or having a prescription dispensed). Excluding supplements, 18.2% reported medication use, while 48.7% had prescriptions dispensed. In NIMATS, 20.4% of pregnancies had vitamins and 1.2% antacids compared to 1.4% and 0.1% respectively in EPD. All other medications were more commonly prescribed than reported, with moderate agreement for antiemetics (kappa 0.42, 95% CI 0.41-0.43), anticoagulants (kappa 0.62, 95% CI 0.61-0.64) and antihypertensives (kappa 0.62, 95% CI 0.61- 0.64). Agreement was lowest for 400mg folic acid (kappa -0.09, 95% CI -0.10 - -0.09). There was considerable underreporting of medicines for chronic use, such as antiepileptics, at the first antenatal appointment. ConclusionsMedication use during early pregnancy was common. Women obtained vitamins and antiacids over the counter rather than by prescription, but all other medications were prescribed more. Non-compliance and discontinuation may explain some of the disagreement, but reporting of prescribed medicines for chronic illnesses was incomplete in antenatal records. To identify all medication use, combining maternal reporting with prescribing data is recommended.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2910
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medication use from conception to the first antenatal appointment: agreement between maternal self-report to midwife and prescribing records in Northern Ireland in 2011-2016

International Journal for Population Data Science
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
article

Medication use from conception to the first antenatal appointment: agreement between maternal self-report to midwife and prescribing records in Northern Ireland in 2011-2016

article en

Abstract

IntroductionData reliability must be considered before using administrative healthcare databases to study medication utilisation and safety during pregnancy. ObjectivesTo compare medication use reported by the mother and recorded by midwives at the first antenatal visit in the Northern Ireland (NI) Maternity System (NIMATS) to dispensed prescriptions recorded in the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD). MethodsA population-based linked cohort study including all resident women in NI who gave birth between 01/01/2011 and 31/12/2016. Prescriptions dispensed in the EPD between the last menstrual period and the first antenatal visit were compared to medications recorded in NIMATS. The number and proportion of pregnancies with medications in each data source were calculated along with Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity. ResultsOf the 139,687 pregnancies in NIMATS (106,206 women), 74.3% reported taking medication, including supplements, and 63.5% had prescriptions dispensed (with 86.9% reporting taking medication or having a prescription dispensed). Excluding supplements, 18.2% reported medication use, while 48.7% had prescriptions dispensed. In NIMATS, 20.4% of pregnancies had vitamins and 1.2% antacids compared to 1.4% and 0.1% respectively in EPD. All other medications were more commonly prescribed than reported, with moderate agreement for antiemetics (kappa 0.42, 95% CI 0.41-0.43), anticoagulants (kappa 0.62, 95% CI 0.61-0.64) and antihypertensives (kappa 0.62, 95% CI 0.61- 0.64). Agreement was lowest for 400mg folic acid (kappa -0.09, 95% CI -0.10 - -0.09). There was considerable underreporting of medicines for chronic use, such as antiepileptics, at the first antenatal appointment. ConclusionsMedication use during early pregnancy was common. Women obtained vitamins and antiacids over the counter rather than by prescription, but all other medications were prescribed more. Non-compliance and discontinuation may explain some of the disagreement, but reporting of prescribed medicines for chronic illnesses was incomplete in antenatal records. To identify all medication use, combining maternal reporting with prescribing data is recommended.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(1)
University of Ulster (GB), Public Health Agency (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.