Comparing Mediterranean, Dietary Phytochemical Index, and Healthy Eating Indices with a Theoretical Model of a Dental Diet Risk Score: An In-Silico Modeling Study

Diet plays a central role in oral health. Free sugars and acidic beverages are major risk factors, whereas phytochemical-rich and fiber-dense foods exert protective effects. Widely used indices such as the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score (MEDAS), Dietary Phytochemical Index (DPI), and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) were not originally developed to capture oral health outcomes. This study aimed to develop a theoretical Dental Diet Risk Score (DDRS), integrating sugar intake, acidic beverage exposure, protective foods, and overall dietary quality, and to compare its alignment with MEDAS, DPI, and HEI through in-silico modeling. A total of 10,000 synthetic dietary profiles were simulated. MEDAS, DPI, and HEI were normalized to a 0-100 scale. DDRS was calculated as 0.40S + 0.20A + 0.25(100-K) + 0.15(100-Q), where S = sugar, A = acidic beverages, K = protective foods, and Q = overall quality. Pearson correlations, variance decomposition, scenario testing, and sensitivity analyses were performed. DDRS correlated inversely with all three indices: MEDAS (r = -0.62), DPI (r = -0.68), and HEI (r = -0.54). Sugar explained 42% of DDRS variance, followed by protective foods (28%), acidic beverages (18%), and overall quality (12%). Scenario analyses demonstrated DDRS medians of 28 for high-quality diets and 76 for low-quality, high-sugar diets. Sensitivity analyses confirmed sugar exposure as the most influential determinant. In conclusion, MEDAS, DPI, and HEI were all inversely associated with theoretical dental diet risk, with DPI showing the strongest protective alignment. The DDRS represents a novel conceptual framework linking dietary indices with oral health outcomes and warrants validation in real-world populations. No empirical validation was performed in this in-silico study; however, the DDRS framework provides a theoretical basis for future benchmarking against clinical oral health outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97713
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Mediterranean, Dietary Phytochemical Index, and Healthy Eating Indices with a Theoretical Model of a Dental Diet Risk Score: An In-Silico Modeling Study

Cureus
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Comparing Mediterranean, Dietary Phytochemical Index, and Healthy Eating Indices with a Theoretical Model of a Dental Diet Risk Score: An In-Silico Modeling Study

article en

Abstract

Diet plays a central role in oral health. Free sugars and acidic beverages are major risk factors, whereas phytochemical-rich and fiber-dense foods exert protective effects. Widely used indices such as the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score (MEDAS), Dietary Phytochemical Index (DPI), and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) were not originally developed to capture oral health outcomes. This study aimed to develop a theoretical Dental Diet Risk Score (DDRS), integrating sugar intake, acidic beverage exposure, protective foods, and overall dietary quality, and to compare its alignment with MEDAS, DPI, and HEI through in-silico modeling. A total of 10,000 synthetic dietary profiles were simulated. MEDAS, DPI, and HEI were normalized to a 0-100 scale. DDRS was calculated as 0.40S + 0.20A + 0.25(100-K) + 0.15(100-Q), where S = sugar, A = acidic beverages, K = protective foods, and Q = overall quality. Pearson correlations, variance decomposition, scenario testing, and sensitivity analyses were performed. DDRS correlated inversely with all three indices: MEDAS (r = -0.62), DPI (r = -0.68), and HEI (r = -0.54). Sugar explained 42% of DDRS variance, followed by protective foods (28%), acidic beverages (18%), and overall quality (12%). Scenario analyses demonstrated DDRS medians of 28 for high-quality diets and 76 for low-quality, high-sugar diets. Sensitivity analyses confirmed sugar exposure as the most influential determinant. In conclusion, MEDAS, DPI, and HEI were all inversely associated with theoretical dental diet risk, with DPI showing the strongest protective alignment. The DDRS represents a novel conceptual framework linking dietary indices with oral health outcomes and warrants validation in real-world populations. No empirical validation was performed in this in-silico study; however, the DDRS framework provides a theoretical basis for future benchmarking against clinical oral health outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Dicle University (TR), Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.