The Politics of Wildfires: A Review and Research Agenda

This review synthesizes political and social science research on wildfire politics focused on the Global South, offering a multi-scalar framework encompassing four proposed levels of analysis: supra-politics, state-politics, para-politics, and infra-politics. Challenging dominant technocratic and Global North-centric paradigms, the article emphasizes how power, knowledge systems, and socio-economic practices, alongside international and national norms and institutions, shape fire regimes and management strategies. The analysis highlights the complexity of wildfire politics by examining how fires are governed, contested, and symbolically charged across diverse landscapes and socio-political contexts. Following the review of 147 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2024, the article calls for a multidisciplinary, decolonial, and context-sensitive approach to fire governance. We ultimately argue that wildfire politics cannot be fully understood without recognizing the socio-ecological interdependencies and political dynamics that structure land use, livelihoods, and environmental justice in fire-prone regions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17698732
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Wildfires: A Review and Research Agenda

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

The Politics of Wildfires: A Review and Research Agenda

article en

Abstract

This review synthesizes political and social science research on wildfire politics focused on the Global South, offering a multi-scalar framework encompassing four proposed levels of analysis: supra-politics, state-politics, para-politics, and infra-politics. Challenging dominant technocratic and Global North-centric paradigms, the article emphasizes how power, knowledge systems, and socio-economic practices, alongside international and national norms and institutions, shape fire regimes and management strategies. The analysis highlights the complexity of wildfire politics by examining how fires are governed, contested, and symbolically charged across diverse landscapes and socio-political contexts. Following the review of 147 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2024, the article calls for a multidisciplinary, decolonial, and context-sensitive approach to fire governance. We ultimately argue that wildfire politics cannot be fully understood without recognizing the socio-ecological interdependencies and political dynamics that structure land use, livelihoods, and environmental justice in fire-prone regions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT), University of Turin (IT), University of Glasgow (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.