A Comparative Analysis of Weather Risk Management Instruments: Traditional Insurance, Parametric Insurance, and Weather Derivatives

This study provides a comparative analysis of three major risk management tools: traditional agricultural insurance, parametric insurance, and climate derivatives. Traditional insurance provides coverage for actual losses but suffers from potential moral hazard and slow claims payment. Parametric insurance and climate derivatives enable rapid and automatic payouts based on climate indices. However, these index-based solutions are constrained by basis risk, which can lead to mismatches between payouts and actual losses. The trade-offs suggest that no single instrument offers a universally optimal solution; instead, a complementary approach combining these mechanisms is essential to strengthen the resilience of agriculture against unpredictable climate risks.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17697651
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Weather Risk Management Instruments: Traditional Insurance, Parametric Insurance, and Weather Derivatives

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

A Comparative Analysis of Weather Risk Management Instruments: Traditional Insurance, Parametric Insurance, and Weather Derivatives

article en

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of three major risk management tools: traditional agricultural insurance, parametric insurance, and climate derivatives. Traditional insurance provides coverage for actual losses but suffers from potential moral hazard and slow claims payment. Parametric insurance and climate derivatives enable rapid and automatic payouts based on climate indices. However, these index-based solutions are constrained by basis risk, which can lead to mismatches between payouts and actual losses. The trade-offs suggest that no single instrument offers a universally optimal solution; instead, a complementary approach combining these mechanisms is essential to strengthen the resilience of agriculture against unpredictable climate risks.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.