Intelligent Sustainability: Evaluating Transformers for Cryptocurrency Environmental Claims

This research investigates the efficacy of transformer architectures in classifying sustainability claims made by cryptocurrency projects, addressing a critical gap in automated environmental impact assessment of digital assets. Employing design science research (DSR) methodology, we develop and empirically evaluate a novel framework comparing five state-of-the-art transformer models across multiple performance dimensions. Through rigorous analysis of 300 synthetic cryptocurrency sustainability news articles, we demonstrate that RoBERTa-large-MNLI achieves optimal performance (F1: 1.00) with exceptional prediction stability (0.98)—meaning highly consistent predictions across varied inputs—and minimal entropy (0.05)—indicating strong confidence in classification decisions—albeit at higher computational costs. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions about the inverse relationship between model complexity and prediction reliability in specialized financial domains. The results advance theoretical understanding of transfer learning in sustainable finance while establishing quantitative benchmarks for automated environmental claim verification. This research contributes to both academic literature and regulatory frameworks by providing empirically validated methodologies for distinguishing between substantive and symbolic environmental initiatives in cryptocurrency markets. The findings provide valuable guidelines for cryptocurrency projects, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies seeking to implement automated sustainability assessment systems, while establishing a foundation for future research in the intersection of artificial intelligence and sustainable finance.