De-Identified Medical Datasets and the 2025 Readiness Gap:

Foundation models (FMs)—large-scale machine learning models trained on vast, diverse datasets—are reshaping the future of medical AI by powering diagnostic tools, clinical decision systems, and health information summarization. Sometimes referred to as large language models (LLMs) when applied to text, these models are increasingly deployed across clinical contexts. However, the de-identified datasets that form the backbone of FM training are often outdated, demographically limited, and difficult to access. These limitations raise profound concerns about fairness, scientific validity, and the potential for harm—particularly for marginalized populations underrepresented in training data. This paper argues that current de-identified datasets are not adequately representative or accessible for building trustworthy AI in healthcare. It critiques the prevailing assumption that de-identification alone ensures ethical readiness, showing instead how it can obscure structural biases and entrench inequality. Drawing on recent research and emerging technical and policy solutions—including synthetic data generation, automated de-identification, and global benchmarking—this paper explores what it means for datasets to be “2025-ready.” It proposes a new standard for responsible dataset design, grounded in demographic transparency, equity-centered governance, and inclusive participation in medical AI development.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford OJS Journals
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60690/7wx58a79
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-Identified Medical Datasets and the 2025 Readiness Gap:

Stanford OJS Journals
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

De-Identified Medical Datasets and the 2025 Readiness Gap:

article en

Abstract

Foundation models (FMs)—large-scale machine learning models trained on vast, diverse datasets—are reshaping the future of medical AI by powering diagnostic tools, clinical decision systems, and health information summarization. Sometimes referred to as large language models (LLMs) when applied to text, these models are increasingly deployed across clinical contexts. However, the de-identified datasets that form the backbone of FM training are often outdated, demographically limited, and difficult to access. These limitations raise profound concerns about fairness, scientific validity, and the potential for harm—particularly for marginalized populations underrepresented in training data. This paper argues that current de-identified datasets are not adequately representative or accessible for building trustworthy AI in healthcare. It critiques the prevailing assumption that de-identification alone ensures ethical readiness, showing instead how it can obscure structural biases and entrench inequality. Drawing on recent research and emerging technical and policy solutions—including synthetic data generation, automated de-identification, and global benchmarking—this paper explores what it means for datasets to be “2025-ready.” It proposes a new standard for responsible dataset design, grounded in demographic transparency, equity-centered governance, and inclusive participation in medical AI development.

Stanford OJS Journals
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De-Identified Medical Datasets and the 2025 Readiness Gap: · Stanford OJS Journals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS