Erecting the Institutional Edifice of Theory: The Mediums of <i>Diacritics</i> and <i>Critical Inquiry</i> , 1970–1990

This article focuses on the print culture of “theory” in Diacritics and Critical Inquiry. Each medium represented a variety of “theory journal,” and each medium’s organization, development, and production bore heavily on their intellectual projects. In addition, Diacritics and Critical Inquiry, from the 1970s to about 1990, were mediums that not only “carried out the aims of advanced research” but where scholars breached the “postwar settlement” of the 1950s and 1960s, when literary and social criticism withdrew from explicit politics. For, while scholars from across the humanities contributed to Diacritics and Critical Inquiry, many were literary scholars who used theory not simply to “professionalize the critical move” but also to make political claims that had an interdisciplinary reach. Still, Diacritics and Critical Inquiry formalized postatomistic views in ways that assumed an explicitly political cast only in fits and starts. And because theory was in part rooted in philosophical traditions from nineteenth- and twentieth-century mainland Europe, the mediums of theory that this article examines contributed to the invention of “Continental philosophy” in the Anglo-American world.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Humanities
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737039
Primary Topic
Education, Philosophy, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erecting the Institutional Edifice of Theory: The Mediums of Diacritics and Critical Inquiry , 1970–1990

History of Humanities
Education, Philosophy, and Society
article

Erecting the Institutional Edifice of Theory: The Mediums of Diacritics and Critical Inquiry , 1970–1990

article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the print culture of “theory” in Diacritics and Critical Inquiry. Each medium represented a variety of “theory journal,” and each medium’s organization, development, and production bore heavily on their intellectual projects. In addition, Diacritics and Critical Inquiry, from the 1970s to about 1990, were mediums that not only “carried out the aims of advanced research” but where scholars breached the “postwar settlement” of the 1950s and 1960s, when literary and social criticism withdrew from explicit politics. For, while scholars from across the humanities contributed to Diacritics and Critical Inquiry, many were literary scholars who used theory not simply to “professionalize the critical move” but also to make political claims that had an interdisciplinary reach. Still, Diacritics and Critical Inquiry formalized postatomistic views in ways that assumed an explicitly political cast only in fits and starts. And because theory was in part rooted in philosophical traditions from nineteenth- and twentieth-century mainland Europe, the mediums of theory that this article examines contributed to the invention of “Continental philosophy” in the Anglo-American world.

History of HumanitiesVol. 10(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Education, Philosophy, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.