Reconfiguring regional power: BRICS economic and strategic engagement in the Middle East, 2020–2024

Introduction This article examines BRICS economic, strategic, financial, and normative engagement in the Middle East between 2020 and 2024, conceptualizing BRICS+ as a dual political form: a collective platform of non-Western institutional coordination and a constellation of divergent national strategies. Methods The study combines structured discourse analysis of five BRICS summit declarations, comparative case analysis of Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt, and secondary quantitative evidence on trade, development finance, payment systems, and reserve-currency dominance. Results China primarily advances infrastructure, energy interdependence, financial connectivity, and selective mediation; Russia relies more on security diplomacy, energy coordination, and anti-sanctions narratives; and India practices strategic hedging through simultaneous BRICS participation, Gulf partnerships, the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, and continued engagement with Western institutions. Regional actors use BRICS-related ties to widen strategic options rather than replace existing Western partnerships. BRICS-linked trade, development finance, local-currency mechanisms, and CBDC experimentation have expanded, but remain insufficient to displace the United States-centered security architecture or the dollar-centered monetary system. Discussion BRICS contributes to a qualified pluralization of Middle Eastern regional order. Its influence is cumulative rather than revolutionary and is mediated through regional agency, infrastructural power, monetary experimentation, and internal contradictions among BRICS members.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1891792
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring regional power: BRICS economic and strategic engagement in the Middle East, 2020–2024

Frontiers in Political Science
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Reconfiguring regional power: BRICS economic and strategic engagement in the Middle East, 2020–2024

article en

Abstract

Introduction This article examines BRICS economic, strategic, financial, and normative engagement in the Middle East between 2020 and 2024, conceptualizing BRICS+ as a dual political form: a collective platform of non-Western institutional coordination and a constellation of divergent national strategies. Methods The study combines structured discourse analysis of five BRICS summit declarations, comparative case analysis of Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt, and secondary quantitative evidence on trade, development finance, payment systems, and reserve-currency dominance. Results China primarily advances infrastructure, energy interdependence, financial connectivity, and selective mediation; Russia relies more on security diplomacy, energy coordination, and anti-sanctions narratives; and India practices strategic hedging through simultaneous BRICS participation, Gulf partnerships, the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, and continued engagement with Western institutions. Regional actors use BRICS-related ties to widen strategic options rather than replace existing Western partnerships. BRICS-linked trade, development finance, local-currency mechanisms, and CBDC experimentation have expanded, but remain insufficient to displace the United States-centered security architecture or the dollar-centered monetary system. Discussion BRICS contributes to a qualified pluralization of Middle Eastern regional order. Its influence is cumulative rather than revolutionary and is mediated through regional agency, infrastructural power, monetary experimentation, and internal contradictions among BRICS members.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
Swiss National Science Foundation (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.