Social comparisons, reference points and financial risk-taking

This cumulative dissertation investigates the influence of social comparisons on financial risk-taking, with a particular focus on factors that moderate this relationship. The first paper examines how social anchors versus non-social anchors affect financial risk-taking within the framework of Prospect Theory’s value function (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). The second paper explores the impact of rank-based endowments on risk-taking, contingent on different rank determinants, particularly with respect to the degree of individual control. It further investigates whether this effect is primarily driven by monetary preferences or by social comparison motives. The third paper analyzes whether providing information about the average expected payoff in risk-taking experiments constitutes a confounding factor, and thus impacts experimental results.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/84603
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social comparisons, reference points and financial risk-taking

Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Social comparisons, reference points and financial risk-taking

article en

Abstract

This cumulative dissertation investigates the influence of social comparisons on financial risk-taking, with a particular focus on factors that moderate this relationship. The first paper examines how social anchors versus non-social anchors affect financial risk-taking within the framework of Prospect Theory’s value function (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). The second paper explores the impact of rank-based endowments on risk-taking, contingent on different rank determinants, particularly with respect to the degree of individual control. It further investigates whether this effect is primarily driven by monetary preferences or by social comparison motives. The third paper analyzes whether providing information about the average expected payoff in risk-taking experiments constitutes a confounding factor, and thus impacts experimental results.

Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.