Water-nitrogen use, rice growth and yield dynamics in cold regions of Northeast China: A five-year study

Rice production in the cold region of Northeast China is highly sensitive to irrigation regimes and inter-annual meteorological variations, but the long-term effects of traditional flood irrigation (TFI) and controlled irrigation (CTI) on rice growth, yield formation, water-nitrogen use efficiency, and grain quality remain insufficiently quantified. This knowledge gap hinders the development of sustainable irrigation strategies for improving yield stability and resource use efficiency in the region. To address this, a five-year field experiment (2018–2022) combined with the previously developed ORYZA-N model was conducted to evaluate TFI and CTI in the cold region of Northeast China. Meteorological data (temperature, radiation, rainfall, etc.), rice growth and yield-related traits, water-nitrogen use efficiency, and grain quality were monitored throughout the growing seasons. Key results indicated that July and August were critical for rice spike blooming, grain filling and ripening, as these stages determined final yield by governing sink capacity, grain filling rate and thousand-grain weight (TGW). Inter-annual yield variability was mainly driven by uneven temperature and radiation distribution during the growing season, while excessive rainfall in the reproductive stage of wet years further reduced yields. Water excess or deficit in paddies adversely affected rice growth and yield across all years, emphasizing the need for shallow flood irrigation with timely field drying to stabilize yield. In terms of water-nitrogen use, CTI enhanced water and nitrogen use in wet years, whereas TFI performed better in normal years. For yield, CTI increased effective spikes and yield in wet years (with minimal differences in grain filling rate and TGW between regimes), while TFI produced more spikes and grains to achieve higher yield in normal years. Importantly, CTI did not compromise grain quality compared to TFI. These findings indicate that CTI is a promising strategy for wet years in Northeast China’s cold region, as it improves yield stability and water-nitrogen use efficiency without sacrificing grain quality, while TFI remains suitable for normal years. This study provides a scientific basis for optimizing irrigation management and promoting sustainable rice production in cold regions with variable meteorology. • Five-year (2018–2022) field monitoring of traditional flood irrigation (TFI) and controlled irrigation (CTI) was conducted. • ORYZA-N complemented field water-nitrogen, rice growth and yield process data. • Rainfall-radiation in key stages cause rice growth and yield components variations. • CTI excelled in wet years; TFI in normal years for growth, yield and efficiencies. • Compared with TFI, CTI does not significantly reduce rice yield and grain quality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.110003
Primary Topic
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water-nitrogen use, rice growth and yield dynamics in cold regions of Northeast China: A five-year study

Agricultural Water Management
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
article

Water-nitrogen use, rice growth and yield dynamics in cold regions of Northeast China: A five-year study

article en

Abstract

Rice production in the cold region of Northeast China is highly sensitive to irrigation regimes and inter-annual meteorological variations, but the long-term effects of traditional flood irrigation (TFI) and controlled irrigation (CTI) on rice growth, yield formation, water-nitrogen use efficiency, and grain quality remain insufficiently quantified. This knowledge gap hinders the development of sustainable irrigation strategies for improving yield stability and resource use efficiency in the region. To address this, a five-year field experiment (2018–2022) combined with the previously developed ORYZA-N model was conducted to evaluate TFI and CTI in the cold region of Northeast China. Meteorological data (temperature, radiation, rainfall, etc.), rice growth and yield-related traits, water-nitrogen use efficiency, and grain quality were monitored throughout the growing seasons. Key results indicated that July and August were critical for rice spike blooming, grain filling and ripening, as these stages determined final yield by governing sink capacity, grain filling rate and thousand-grain weight (TGW). Inter-annual yield variability was mainly driven by uneven temperature and radiation distribution during the growing season, while excessive rainfall in the reproductive stage of wet years further reduced yields. Water excess or deficit in paddies adversely affected rice growth and yield across all years, emphasizing the need for shallow flood irrigation with timely field drying to stabilize yield. In terms of water-nitrogen use, CTI enhanced water and nitrogen use in wet years, whereas TFI performed better in normal years. For yield, CTI increased effective spikes and yield in wet years (with minimal differences in grain filling rate and TGW between regimes), while TFI produced more spikes and grains to achieve higher yield in normal years. Importantly, CTI did not compromise grain quality compared to TFI. These findings indicate that CTI is a promising strategy for wet years in Northeast China’s cold region, as it improves yield stability and water-nitrogen use efficiency without sacrificing grain quality, while TFI remains suitable for normal years. This study provides a scientific basis for optimizing irrigation management and promoting sustainable rice production in cold regions with variable meteorology. • Five-year (2018–2022) field monitoring of traditional flood irrigation (TFI) and controlled irrigation (CTI) was conducted. • ORYZA-N complemented field water-nitrogen, rice growth and yield process data. • Rainfall-radiation in key stages cause rice growth and yield components variations. • CTI excelled in wet years; TFI in normal years for growth, yield and efficiencies. • Compared with TFI, CTI does not significantly reduce rice yield and grain quality.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 322
University of Jinan (CN), Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (PT), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.