Early Versus Late Weight-Bearing After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Comparative Review

Early weight-bearing (EWB) and late weight-bearing (LWB) protocols are the two primary regimens implemented for patients following ankle fracture surgery, yet their outcomes remain variable. This review aimed to assess these protocols, including their limitations and implications, to support more tailored postoperative management and ultimately improve patient recovery. EWB demonstrated superior short-term outcomes compared to LWB, including higher functional assessment scores, improved range of motion, and earlier return to work times. However, patients in this group revealed lower protocol adherence and higher wound-related issues in select patients, including complication and reoperation rates. As a result, LWB is more often favored by surgeons for elderly, diabetic, or morbidly obese patients despite lower early functional outcome scores. Overall, the literature remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for personalized rehabilitation plans and further research to refine risk stratification and optimize recovery across diverse patient populations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97417
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Versus Late Weight-Bearing After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Comparative Review

Cureus
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Early Versus Late Weight-Bearing After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Comparative Review

article en

Abstract

Early weight-bearing (EWB) and late weight-bearing (LWB) protocols are the two primary regimens implemented for patients following ankle fracture surgery, yet their outcomes remain variable. This review aimed to assess these protocols, including their limitations and implications, to support more tailored postoperative management and ultimately improve patient recovery. EWB demonstrated superior short-term outcomes compared to LWB, including higher functional assessment scores, improved range of motion, and earlier return to work times. However, patients in this group revealed lower protocol adherence and higher wound-related issues in select patients, including complication and reoperation rates. As a result, LWB is more often favored by surgeons for elderly, diabetic, or morbidly obese patients despite lower early functional outcome scores. Overall, the literature remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for personalized rehabilitation plans and further research to refine risk stratification and optimize recovery across diverse patient populations.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US), University of North Texas (US), Kansas City University (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), University of New England (US), UC Davis Health (US), A.T. Still University (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.