Using a fine-tuned large language model for symptom-based depression evaluation

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), show promise for mental health applications, including the automated detection of depressive symptoms from natural language. We fine-tuned a German BERT-based LLM to predict individual Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores using a regression approach across different symptom items (0–6 severity scale), based on structured clinical interviews with transdiagnostic patients as well as synthetically generated interviews. The fine-tuned model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.7–1.0 across items, with accuracies ranging from 79 to 88%, closely matching clinician ratings. Fine-tuning resulted in a 75% reduction in prediction errors relative to the untrained model. These findings demonstrate the potential of lightweight LLMs to accurately assess depressive symptom severity, offering a scalable tool for clinical decision-making, and monitoring treatment progress, particularly in low-resource settings.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280629
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a fine-tuned large language model for symptom-based depression evaluation

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Mental Health via Writing
article

Using a fine-tuned large language model for symptom-based depression evaluation

article en

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), show promise for mental health applications, including the automated detection of depressive symptoms from natural language. We fine-tuned a German BERT-based LLM to predict individual Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores using a regression approach across different symptom items (0–6 severity scale), based on structured clinical interviews with transdiagnostic patients as well as synthetically generated interviews. The fine-tuned model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.7–1.0 across items, with accuracies ranging from 79 to 88%, closely matching clinician ratings. Fine-tuning resulted in a 75% reduction in prediction errors relative to the untrained model. These findings demonstrate the potential of lightweight LLMs to accurately assess depressive symptom severity, offering a scalable tool for clinical decision-making, and monitoring treatment progress, particularly in low-resource settings.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.